Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 10:25 a.m. No.76499   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Originally South Africa #5 >>13438641

“Ugandans criticize oil pipeline deal with Tanzania and Total” - https://www.dw.com/en/ugandans-criticize-oil-pipeline-deal-with-tanzania-and-total/a-57186579. [Signed soon after the death of Tanzania’s President. Coincidence? Total is dealing with another corrupt African government.] Below are excerpts.

 

Ugandans are making disparaging comments on social media about the multibillion-dollar oil pipeline deal that the country has signed with Tanzania and Total. The secrecy surrounding it has raised fears of corruption.

 

Uganda, Tanzania and the French oil company Total, along with its investment partner in Uganda, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), signed a series of agreements on Sunday to build a heated pipeline that will carry crude oil from western Uganda to the Indian Ocean coast.

 

The deal, worth $3.5 billion (€2.9 billion), and the secrecy surrounding the details have raised public fears of corruption.

 

Uganda's crude oil is highly viscous, which means that it needs to be heated to remain liquid enough to flow. The East African Crude Oil Project Pipeline (EACOPP) could be the longest electrically heated crude oil pipeline in the world, at 1,400 kilometers (850 miles). Construction is expected to begin this year.

 

Tanzania's new leader, President Samia Suluhu Hassan, was in Uganda to witness the signing of the documents — perhaps her most important executive action since her inauguration in March.

 

The event was "an auspicious occasion" that would unlock the development of the region's oil resources, she said. The shareholder agreements cover the construction of the pipeline, which is designed to connect oil fields near Lake Albert to the Tanzanian port of Tanga.

 

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni hailed the deal as a major milestone and a victory for the countries.

 

Watchdog groups and others also have warned against the personalization of Uganda's oil resources and heavy borrowing by national budget authorities anticipating oil revenue.

 

Civil society groups led by the African Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) have been urging the governments of Uganda and Tanzania and the oil companies to call off their plans.

 

The AFIEGO noted that some of the people affected by the pipeline have not been compensated and that the oil developments are also taking place in an ecologically sensitive conservation area.

 

In an interveiw with DW, Diana Nabiruma, the communications head for AFIEGO, said: "Previously Uganda has signed secret agreements, and Ugandans have lost. For instance, the president told us that electricity in Uganda is expensive because government officials conspired to sign agreements that favor bidding companies. Now we are seeing this being repeated in the oil sector."

 

They continue to question the fact that the oil deals are still secret despite Uganda being a member of the Extractives Industries Transparency Initiative, Nabiruma added.

 

President Museveni, who has led Uganda since 1986, has sometimes suggested that the discovery of commercially viable oil quantities in 2006 created an opportunity for him to remain in power. "They are targeting my oil," he said of his challengers in the country's 2016 presidential election.

 

His personalization of the oil fields quickly dashed hopes in Uganda that the country could become an oil Eldorado. After that, the scramble to evict residents began and was often perpetrated by Museveni's cronies and members of his inner circle.

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 11:25 a.m. No.76504   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6538 >>6566 >>6682

NEW: The Arizona House and Senate have passed a bill that would require parental permission for a child to be taught anything about sexual orientation and gender identity

 

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1383041130275672069

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 11:36 a.m. No.76505   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6507 >>6538 >>6566 >>6682

Originally Canada #17 >>13439772

Court rules Canada can turn away asylum seekers entering from the United States

 

Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal has ruled that the agreement that allows Canada to turn back asylum seekers from the United States does not violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

On Thursday, a three-person panel of judges unanimously ruled that the safe third country agreement between the governments of Canada and the United States is constitutional.

 

“Those who arrive in the United States must claim refugee status in the United States under United States law. They cannot leave the United States and claim refugee status in Canada at a land port of entry. If they do so, Canada can refuse to consider their refugee claim and, if they have no other legal basis for remaining in Canada, return them to the United States,” the ruling read.

 

The decision was welcomed by the Canadian government, which said the agreement is an important part of Canada’s handling of asylum claimants.

 

The [safe third country agreement] has served Canada well for 16 years, ensuring that our shared border remains well managed. For the last three years, Canada has welcomed more refugees than any other country in the world, and continues to provide protection to those fleeing conflict and persecution,” Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada said in a statement.

 

“Canada remains firmly committed to upholding a fair and compassionate refugee protection system and the STCA remains a comprehensive means for the compassionate, fair, and orderly handling of asylum claims at the Canada-U.S. land border.”

 

According to the safe third country agreement, Canada can turn away migrants attempting to seek asylum if they are arriving from the United States. As both countries consider each other safe countries, individuals must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in.

 

In July 2020, the Federal Court ruled that safe third country agreement violates the Charter’s guarantees of life, liberty and security. On Thursday, the panel accepted the federal government’s arguments that the court misinterpreted the relevant laws.

 

The panel granted a six month extension to safe third country agreement, with a future court case deciding the ultimate future of the agreement.

 

In recent years, Canada has seen an influx of people trying to seek asylum in Canada by illegally crossing the US border. Under the safe third country agreement, Canada could have turned back many of these crossers.

 

In 2019, the influx into crossing points like Roxham Road led the Trudeau government to spend millions on housing and other benefits for illegal border crossers.

https://tnc.news/2021/04/16/court-rules–can-turn-away-asylum-seekers-entering-from-the-united-states/

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 2:08 p.m. No.76514   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6520 >>6538 >>6566 >>6682

Raúl Castro steps down as Cuban Communist Party leader

16 April 2021

 

Raúl Castro says he is resigning as Cuban Communist Party leader, ending his family's six decades in power.

 

Mr Castro, 89, told a party congress that he is handing over the leadership to a younger generation "full of passion and anti-imperialist spirit".

 

His successor will be voted in at the end of the four-day congress.

 

The move, which was expected, ends the era of formal leadership by him and his brother Fidel Castro, which began with the 1959 revolution.

 

"I believe fervently in the strength and exemplary nature and comprehension of my compatriots," he told party delegates in Havana on Friday.

 

"And as long as I live I will be ready with my foot in the stirrups to defend the fatherland, the revolution and socialism."

 

Although Mr Castro has not endorsed a successor, it is widely believed the party leadership will pass to Miguel Díaz-Canel, who took over as the island's president in 2018.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-56780903

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 2:18 p.m. No.76515   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6538 >>6566 >>6682

Biden keeps historically low Trump era cap on refugees

16 April 2021

 

Joe Biden is keeping the number of refugees allowed in each year to the US to historic lows, disappointing campaigners and some Democrats.

 

The maximum number allowed in will be 15,000, a number set by Mr Biden's predecessor as president, Donald Trump.

 

Just two months ago President Biden put forward a plan which would raise the ceiling to 62,500.

 

Reports say he is concerned about the optics of letting in more people amid an influx at the US-Mexico border.

 

On Friday, Mr Biden signed an order designed to speed up refugee admissions to the US - since October just over 2,000 have been admitted.

 

The order also changes the allocation of who is allowed in, with more slots being provided to arrivals from Africa, the Middle East and Central America, and an end to restrictions on resettlements from Somalia, Syria and Yemen.

 

But there will be no change to the 15,000 cap. Nearly 85,000 were resettled in the last year of Barack Obama's presidency.

 

The White House has indicated the limit may still be raised, and spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the delay was because it "took us some time to see and evaluate how ineffective, or how trashed in some ways the refugee processing system had become".

 

A US official told Reuters the administration was concerned at looking "too open" with rising numbers of migrants arriving at the Mexican borders.

 

The decisions left some Democrats aghast. Senate Foreign Relations Chair Bob Menendez called the figure "appallingly low". Dozens of other party members wrote to President Biden ahead of the decision urging him to raise the cap.

 

The International Rescue Committee said it was "deeply disappointed" and urged the US to return to "global leadership" on refugees.

 

UN figures show there are more than 80 million refugees worldwide, with 85% of them hosted in developing countries.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56778721

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 2:57 p.m. No.76517   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6538 >>6566 >>6682

Facebook faces mass legal action over data leak

21 April 2021

 

Facebook users whose data was compromised by a massive data leak are being urged to take legal action against the tech giant.

 

About 530 million people had some personal information leaked, including, in some cases, phone numbers.

 

A digital privacy group is preparing to take a case to the Irish courts on behalf of EU citizens affected.

 

Facebook denies wrongdoing, saying the data was "scraped" from publicly available information on the site.

 

Antoin Ó Lachtnain, director of Digital Rights Ireland (DRI), warned other tech giants its move could be the beginning of a domino effect.

 

"This will be the first mass action of its kind but we're sure it won't be the last," he said.

 

"The scale of this breach, and the depth of personal information compromised, is gob-smacking."

 

He added: "The laws are there to protect consumers and their personal data and it's time these technology giants wake up to the reality that protection of personal data must be taken seriously."

 

DRI claims Facebook failed to protect user data and notify those who had been affected.

 

The data leak was first discovered and fixed in 2019, but was recently made easily available online for free.

 

DRI said individual users who take part in the legal action could be offered compensation of up to €12,000 (£10,445) if it is successful - based on what it says are similar cases in other countries.

 

Domino effect

 

"If successful this could well set a precedent and open the door to further class action down the line," Ray Walsh, a digital privacy expert at ProPrivacy, told the BBC.

 

"Big Tech might then find that being made to compensate individual users is a strong reminder to work harder on privacy compliance," he added.

 

On Thursday, the Irish Data Protection Commission announced its decision to launch an investigation into the leak.

 

It will assess whether any parts of the GDPR or Data Protection Act 2018 were infringed by Facebook.

 

If found to be in breach, the social media giant could face fines of up to 4% of its turnover.

 

Responding to DRI's legal case, a Facebook spokesman said: "We understand people's concerns, which is why we continue to strengthen our systems to make scraping from Facebook without our permission more difficult and go after the people behind it."

 

He also pointed to other firms involved in similar recent leaks.

 

"As LinkedIn and Clubhouse have shown, no company can completely eliminate scraping or prevent data sets like these from appearing. That's why we devote substantial resources to combat it and will continue to build out our capabilities to help stay ahead of this challenge," he said.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56772772

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 8:50 p.m. No.76542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6566 >>6682

Originally Australia #15 >>13438087

 

Google deceived some Australian mobile users about collection of location data, court finds

 

Jamie McKinnell - 16 April 2021

 

Google could face fines in the "many millions" after the Federal Court found the company misled some Australian mobile and tablet users about how it collects location data.

 

The tech giant was taken to court by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) over on-screen representations it made on Android devices in 2017 and 2018.

 

The case centred on two specific Google settings that affected location data collection; 'location history' and 'web & app activity'.

 

The consumer watchdog claimed Google misled consumers because if 'location history' was disabled but the latter setting was left on, the company continued to collect and use location data.

 

The result represents a partial victory for the ACCC, because the watchdog identified specific user scenarios which constituted contraventions of consumer law.

 

"I am satisfied that Google's conduct assessed as a whole was misleading or deceptive of, or likely to mislead or deceive, ordinary members within the class identified by the ACCC, acting reasonably," Justice Thomas Thawley said in his judgment.

 

"I conclude that Google's conduct assessed as a whole conveyed a representation that having 'web & app activity' turned 'on' would not allow Google to obtain, retain and use personal data about the user's location."

 

The penalty will be decided at a later date and Google could face a penalty of up to $1.1 million per breach.

 

The court will need to decide what it considers a breach and how many occurred but ACCC chair Rod Sims said they will be seeking a penalty in the "many millions".

 

Mr Sims said he was "absolutely delighted" with the result and said it was the first ruling in the world in relation to location data issues.

 

It sent a "very clear message” to digital platforms about the need to be up front with consumers, he added.

 

“Data issues are only going to be more important. It's crucial we get some court rulings in relation to what platforms can and can't do," he said.

 

A Google spokesperson said in a statement the company is "currently reviewing options, including a possible appeal".

 

"We provide robust controls for location data and are always looking to do more - for example we recently introduced auto delete options for location history, making it even easier to control your data," the spokesperson said.

 

Google held 'oh shit' meeting

 

The court heard from experts with expertise in behavioural economics to understand how users approached the task of navigating various screens.

 

That involved a "cost-benefit analysis" and was subject to "behavioural biases", the court was told.

 

The experts engaged on behalf of the ACCC and Google agreed there was a "technological trade-off" between privacy and service quality.

 

The case was run by reference to "classes" of users in three different scenarios, also confined to particular time periods.

 

These included users who set up a Google account for the first time, others who altered their location settings after the initial set up, and those who later considered disabling the 'web & app' setting.

 

Justice Thawley found Google's conduct would have misled some but not all reasonable users in the specified categories.

 

"The number or proportion of reasonable users who were misled, or were likely to have been misled, does not matter for the purposes of establishing contraventions."

 

After an Associated Press (AP) media article covered the location data and settings issue in August 2018, Google urgently held what was internally referred to as the "oh shit" meeting, the court heard.

 

A Google director then circulated documents about what work was being carried out to reduce user confusion.

 

The AP article led to a 500 per cent increase in users disabling both settings, according to internal Google documents.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-04-16/google-misled-some-australian-mobile-users-over-location-history/100074292

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 10 p.m. No.76551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6566 >>6682

USNS MERCY is still west of San Clemente Island. There are a few USN vessels off Sand Diego but nothing looks like a formation. No sign of where the carrier went, I imagine she's still keeping south

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 16, 2021, 10:07 p.m. No.76553   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6566 >>6682

Murdoch's VERTIGO is in Cartagena, Spain. Wexner's LIMITLESS is passing north of the US Virgin Islands broadcasting destination as palm Beach, Florida. Spielberg's SEVEN SEAS went out of rage on the 13th while off the Baja Peninsula

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 17, 2021, 9:19 a.m. No.76570   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6682

Originally Canada #17 >>13446531

 

Demonic: Biden to Ramp Up Experiments Using Aborted Baby Body Parts

 

Back in July 2015, David Dalaiden, the spokesman for Center for Medical Progress, went on The O’Reilly Factor onn FOX New to discuss the organization’s shocking video released earlier that week. The video exposed Planned Parenthood’s business plan that includes harvesting and selling aborted baby body parts.

 

David Dalaiden, the spokesman for the Center for Medical Progress told Bill O’Reilly that Planned Parenthood had been selling baby organs for years.

 

This was absolutely shocking news at that time! Who would think that liberals would be so evil to harvest and sell aborted baby body parts? And yet here we were.

 

TRENDING: Indy FedEx Shooter Identified As 19-Year-Old Known to Locals and Previously Interviewed by FBI – Looks Like Chris Wray Dropped the Ball Once Again!

 

Fast forward to today. Not only are Democrats selling baby body parts but they are completely open about it.

 

In fact, under Joe Biden they are ramping up the sale and use of the baby body parts in their experiments.

 

God, save us!

 

Breitbart.com reported:

 

The Biden-Harris administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced it is reversing the Trump administration’s decision to end taxpayer funding for experimental research that uses fetal tissue derived from aborted babies.

 

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), an agency under the authority of HHS, announced Friday an “Update on Changes to NIH Requirements Regarding Proposed Human Fetal Tissue Research”:

 

On June 5, 2019, HHS announced that NIH intramural research that requires new acquisition of human fetal tissue from elective abortions will not be conducted. Simultaneously, HHS announced new requirements for documentation and review by an Ethics Advisory Board of extramural research applications for NIH grants, cooperative agreements, and R&D contracts proposing the use of human fetal tissue obtained from elective abortions…

 

…This notice informs the extramural research community that HHS is reversing its 2019 decision that all research applications for NIH grants and contracts proposing the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions will be reviewed by an Ethics Advisory Board. Accordingly, HHS/NIH will not convene another NIH Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/demonic-biden-ramp-experiments-using-aborted-baby-body-parts/

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 17, 2021, noon No.76591   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6682

Originally General Research #17035 >>13448115

 

Over 10,000 Deaths Caused by COVID Vaccines Reported by the CDC and EMA

 

More than 10,000 people died shortly after COVID-19 vaccination in December, US and European authorities said. Deaths include more than 7,100 in Europe, according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and 3,005 reported by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), LifeSiteNewsreports.

 

As of Tuesday, EudraVigilance, the EMA’s database of adverse drug reports, reported 4,036 “fatal results” after vaccination with Pfizer, as well as 1,922 and 1,234 deaths after vaccines given by Moderna and , by AstraZeneca.

 

EudraVigilance also reported 20 deaths from the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Johnson & Johnson. The database revealed more than 200,000 injuries, possibly related to the four vaccines, of which tens of thousands of cases considered “serious”. The US government also reported 3,005 deaths and more than 56,869 side effects after the April 12 coronavirus vaccinations.

 

The injuries in the United States are being tracked by VAERS, a surveillance system overseen by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

Among the adverse reaction reports for the COVID-19 vaccine published by VAERS, 42% of deaths occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of inoculation. “Vaccination campaigns, apparently, often take place in nursing homes without ensuring in advance that the person affected has not already contracted an infection,” said Dr. Frank Gunter, a German medical expert, who indicated the“ insufficiently researched long-term consequences ”of vaccines.

 

“I have never seen such a large number of side effects of a vaccine,” said Parisian infectious disease specialist Prof. Eric Caumes last year. “No, really, it’s too much, maybe there’s a problem,” he told Le Parisien. The conclusion of LifeSiteNews is that all healthy people who contract the Covid virus survive, especially with certain treatment schemes.

 

Speaking of vaccines and herd immunity acquired through mass vaccinations (forget about mRNA genetic therapy, which is experimental and very weird), 70% of people already have T-cell immunity from other infections. Children have near 100% immunity due to the many early childhood infections they get. T-cell immunity lasts 15-20 years, and in some cases a lifetime.

 

The body never forgets how to make antibodies, however due to age and other things like toxins and injury cause the immune system to be less effective.

 

Always remember:

 

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ASYMPTOMATIC SPREAD!!!!

 

THERE ARE NO VARIANTS.

 

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/over-10000-deaths-caused-by-covid-vaccines-reported-by-the-cdc-and-ema/

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 17, 2021, 1:50 p.m. No.76622   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6682

Originally South Africa #5 >>13448576

 

“Lindani Myeni: EFF condemns ‘racist killing’ of [South African] rugby player” – USA, the EFF is targeting you as well

 

Lindani Myeni's death has been described by the EFF as racist and senseless. EFF has urged President Ramaphosa to hold the USA accountable.

 

The Economic Freedom Fighters has condemned the killing of KwaZulu-Natal-born rugby player, Lindani Myeni. The 29-year-old was shot dead by police in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA on Wednesday night.

 

Myeni’s death has caused uproar on social media and in South Africa at large, especially from people who knew, grew up with and were close to him.

 

In a statement released on Saturday, 17 April 2021, the party labelled Myeni’s killing as racist and senseless.

 

“The EFF is disgusted by the racist killing of South African rugby player Lindani Myeni. Lindani was shot, unarmed by the racist United States police on a senseless suspicion of robbery.”

 

The EFF has been vocal against racism and acts of human rights violations. In2020, the party embarked on a campaign to support the Black Lives Matter movement in the United States “on a basis of the spate of senseless and racist murders of black people in the United States”

 

The EFF described Myeni as a devoted Christian man who had no criminal record.

 

The party says it urges President Cyril Ramaphosa not to tip toe around Myeni’s issue in front of his masters, the USA authorities. “President Cyril Ramaphosa must demand justice and hold the USA accountable for this senseless killing of Lindani Myeni.

 

“We are also disgusted at the openly racist manner in which the United States is treating fellow Africans in that country. We stand with all progressive forces that are immersed in the fight against this racist country. It is clear that this recent election of Joe Biden which was touted to be the beginning of change in the USA. Clearly this is not so.”

 

Social media has been abuzz with #JusticeForLindaniMyeni flooding the timeline since Friday night.

 

https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/lindani-myeni-eff-condemns-racist-killing-of-rugby-player/

Anonymous ID: 4ba82e April 17, 2021, 8:30 p.m. No.76680   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6682

>>76674

Hearth and Home FIRST

We shall be here, with new stuff

Maybe later with some amazeballs

Do what ya gotta

FRENZ

Hundreds of images stored, not one fits

I really do type too much