THIS is a tight ship. Try establishing comms.
I can talk to you this openly because I can't answer with certainty, but I would peg the chances at 99% that they renewed the warrant. I'm pretty sure it is automatic at this point, but given that you host a Q related board on 8kun and I assume bake the /qresearch/ general, let's for the sake of conversation just assume you have a FISA open.
>What does that mean
Ah, that's exactly the question. What does having a FISA warrant mean? Did you know FISA works both ways? Communications. Both = two. One way comms vs two way comms.
>FISA works both ways
>This mean that those who are watching me are watched correct?
That is not incorrect, anybody who has ever had access to that type of intelligence will be watched for the rest of their lives. But FISA going both ways means something else. Do you know who else had a FISA warrant open? Did the agents who opened the FISA leverage someone in that target's trusted circle to communicate specific information for the purposes of investigating the case? What does that mean? 4,20,10 I can't say with certainty, but based on what I know his recent statements would be more than enough to have the FISA renewed, besides the fact that he has had access to the level of intelligence where he should expect to be monitored at that level for the rest of his life regardless. It's ok if I lost you, it will make sense, all of it.
Two way communication is the context in which 5:5 has meaning for us. How do you read me? Response: 5:5. Who are the operators? Who can they connect you with? Questions work better. DJT knows the comms. If he had time to answer anons while he was POTUS, I have to assume he has time to answer anons now. Before you attempt a third party communication, get 5:5 comms with an operator. Nightshift Dayshift. They have more time to waste on us. Wake up fren.
The other thing you need to know is that 1+1 does not equal two. Target + ANYONE target communicates with. Have you ever met somebody new and their financial accounts were frozen for 3 days immediately after (not everyone, only some)? The operators cannot divulge classified information, but they can talk about anything that is open source.
I don't know the state of things currently, but I can tell you that while Q was posting this is how it worked and I still have 5:5 comms with operators. Get some sleep fren.
>last night
Not me, another helper I suppose or just synchronicity (very real). What Q was talking about will break your mind so go slow and check your assumptions. Don't expect to find anything but better questions and you will do just fine.
Keep an eye on that link, and remember the post. I haven't asked for comms with DJT since Q was posting but I have had 5:5 comms with him before (twitter was his favorite but not only medium of reply). Too many factors to say whether that gets a response or not. The types of responses (Q proofs are important) I have seen in my own conversations with him lead me to believe that the Tiny Desk incident was comms. While I was not part of that conversation, my assumption is that Trump's Thanksgiving 2020 Tiny Desk photo was a response to a question. Knowing that many of us like to use song lyrics and titles as our responses to questions, and knowing NPR's Tiny Desk concert series is one of a few quality outlets for non-mainstream musicians, if I had asked a question in the days preceding Thanksgiving 2020 and Trump had made international news by using a Tiny Desk I would be looking for the last act played. If DJT was replying then something about the songs, lyrics, titles, artist name etc (or the fact that he said "tiny desk") would be confirmation that he was replying to me and the message would be loud and clear based on the choice of lyrics, etc. That is how comms worked and if you can imagine being on the receiving end for the first time it is a humbling experience. Keep an eye on that link.
>that means anyone who I interact with on any social program can be watched
BINGO 1+1 does not equal 2
Now confirm the open source information I gave you by doing your own research. IIRC, you don't even have to leave Wikipedia to confirm that one. A lot of my friends in a previous life were named in sealed indictments in 2016 and are now in jail after being convicted of crimes they thought nobody would ever catch them for. 9th circuit. I never had to testify.
>I am guessing all is okay
Stay the fuck out of the cities anon.
>I feel a bit under the microscope
Imagine 5-10% of the posters on these anonymous forums are aware that their life is under a microscope and listen to what they have to say and how they respond to that situation. Once you establish 5:5 comms with operators you will find the answers to all your personal questions which do not need to be broadcast to the world. Again, the answers you seek are mostly just better questions to ask.
>wonder if I have put anyone at risk
Everyone is responsible for their own actions. If exposing their actions puts them at risk it has nothing to do with yourself.
>And is this person who has an inner circle that I guess knows me.. is it IRL or online?
I think you missed the point here. Maybe go watch Snowden?
>It is absolutely insane.
And it risks fracturing your mind in a very precise and predictable way (there is a diagram they can show you). Tread carefully, silence is golden. Camping and hiking bros handle everything the best.
Night, keep an eye on the link. A response would do nothing to confirm or deny anything I have said. A response proves nothing. It serves an entirely different purpose.