>>80316

Tom, I think you were right about KillerTomato

some major fuckery happening on /qr/ again

first, there was the FlyingOnions BV working with OSS, but anons realized what was going on this weekend

so now, there is a 'new baker', that KillerTomato BV offered to assist out of nowhere

that baker stated he will not be notabling anything, and leave it to anons to decide between themselves to decide

the baker is notabling only 1 or 2 posts per bread

the KillerTomato BV appeared out of nowhere, congratulating him on his 'first bakes', and defending what he's doing

and he seem to be approving a shill tag team that's telling everyone to cope, that that's the new normal

anons are attempting to circumvent this by collecting notes and posting them in the bread

BV KillerTomato just called those 'rat notes'

he claims the 'new baker' chose to notable 'quality' over 'quantity'

and that notables should be decided by concensus in every breads

and of course, the same anons who approve of the "new baker" are the ones deciding what's notable

so it's not just FlyingOnions, it's also KillerTomato

someone said KillerTomato is 8bit, dunno if it's true

it would be funny if it weren't kinda sad

>>80351

notables on /qr/ right now

approved by KillerTomato BV

>>80353

I know it used to be that way

brainstorming on the Q drops when nobody was sure what was going on, everyone was shooting in the dark, and there were few anons, trying to figure things out

but things have changed a long time ago

it's total information warfare now, so many things going on, bakers do a basic filtering of what is Q relevant among what is posted by anons, so that other anons can read the notables and be appraised of what is happening

and don't be mistaken

that 'new baker' and the 'new rules' appeared RIGHT AFTER someone notabled some posts on a dig about the FlyingOnion and OSS

one of the shills "approving" of the new baker even actually said it

it seems it's all BS to justify not notabling those few posts

the interesting point though I think, is that it's not just the FlyingOnions BV that's behind the /qr/ shenanigans

it's also the KillerTomato BV now

I don't buy the sudden 'need to change how things are done on /qr/' for one second

>>80354

>Prob going to have to write a book about the behind the scenes in the kitchen about it all.

I'm sure there will be a lot to tell once everything is said and done

>>80357

all of the above

plus also make the boards look horrible to the outside world

plus try to link anons to shady clown OP happening outside of QR

plus inject clown controlled narrative

plus I'm sure many other things

total information warfare

>>80360

I'm sure the upper echelons are delegating these tasks to 24/7 rotating grunt teams of COINTEL operatives

top guys are probably only in charge in the politics of this

>>80361

in charge of

>>80363

I think it's because they have not fully realized yet that a major part of the /qr/ management team (if not all?) seems to be a clown OP

they still think they can take over the shills

and there's also the fact that there is a lot of infrastructure that was built around the notables: aggregators and the like

too late in the game to reconfigure everything

there's also the fact that Q told us to not leave the battlegrounds

there's also the fact that it's a place where anons can talk to other anons freely, in between the barrage of shills

look at this clown show

the shills must laughing their asses off while conducting this PSYOP

>>80367

didn't know about "WeAreTheNews"

>QR isn't the battleground, twatter and facebook are, QR/MR/8Kun is the backchannel

very true

>Again you are more than welcome here anytime and bring stuffs! its all good buddy!

after seeing what I saw today, I'm pretty sure I'm going to stop wasting my time trying to defend /qr/

>>80368

hiccup?

>>80371

maybe a temporary server overload

I'm exhausted by this day of nonsense, I'm gonna hit the sack

'later