>>8308 pb
>>8322 pb
Diggs on GEMS election management system
>>>/qresearch/11536231
>>>/qresearch/11536288
>>>/qresearch/11536310
>>>/qresearch/11536337
>>>/qresearch/11536394
>>>/qresearch/11536449
>>>/qresearch/11536488
>>>/qresearch/11536534
>>>/qresearch/11536566
>>>/qresearch/11536601
>>>/qresearch/11536629
>>>/qresearch/11544031
Fraction Magic – Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/
1 – Summary –
This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software [ES&S], in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.
>>>/qresearch/11544490
How does this work?
Imagine you have 4 votes split 2:2, and the algo weights them (whether according to which candidate votes go to, to voters' social groups, or even both) at .50 or 1.49 (extreme case, likely much more subtle IRL), but the system only shows pollsters the rounded up integer numbers: .5 and 1.49 both will be rounded to 1, so what you'll see is the real 2:2 split voting.
But now imagine, when tallying the totals, the algo computes votes' weight, not numbers, yet, again, only presents the rounded (integer) totals: what you end up with is a (fraudulent) 1:3 vote split (.5+.5=1 and 1.49+1.49=2.98, which rounds up to 3), and a stolen election!
Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44