>7/12/2021
https://rumble.com/vjr7ft-tech-censorship-violates-constitution.html
Vivek Ramaswamy discusses his WSJ OP-ED on America’s Newsroom.
https://www.americanoversight.org/sessions-letter
.. On November 13, 2017, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote to former House Judiciary Committee Chair Robert Goodlatte informing him that Sessions had directed “senior federal prosecutors” to evaluate issues the congressman had raised in previous letters. Goodlatte had written to Sessions calling for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate Clinton, the Uranium One sale, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s handling of the inquiry into Clinton’s use of a private email server. ..
>7/2/2021
https://rumble.com/vjcgm1-live-president-donald-j-trump-in-sarasota-fl.html
LIVE: President Donald J Trump in Sarasota, FL
there is always something missed ha but i posted it for Anons' enjoyment and i was planning to watch it but then realized i had another video i forgot to watch from earlier:
https://rumble.com/vk60ef-kamala-harris-uses-bible-reference-to-push-vaccine.html
.. so i'm ketch(ing)up rn
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4628618/fbi-probe-hillary-clintons-emails
FBI Probe of Hillary Clinton's Emails
Professor Stephen Vladeck talked about the legal issues involved following the FBI’s October 28 announcement it would examine new evidence in its probe into 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?432006-6/senate-debate-fbi-director-confirmation
Senate Debate on FBI Director Confirmation
Senators spoke about the nomination of Christopher Wray to be the next FBI director. He would replace James Comey, who was fired by President Trump in May 2017.
>blumenthal, feinstein, Grassley
https://projectapario.com/pdf/document/KGDYCRYYG/download
Interview Transcript of John Podesta (December 4, 2017).pdf via https://projectapario.com
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5764384-DOJ-11-18-MSJ-Declaration.html#document/p12/a485899
haha brannan wasn't the only 1 to out coats
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.
After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.
This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.
I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.
So, first, what we have done:
The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.
Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.
Consistent with our counterintelligence responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there is evidence of computer intrusion in connection with the personal e-mail server by any foreign power, or other hostile actors.
I have so far used the singular term, “e-mail server,” in describing the referral that began our investigation. It turns out to have been more complicated than that. Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain. As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways. Piecing all of that back together—to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work—has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.
For example, when one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. Doing that didn’t remove the e-mail content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge finished jigsaw puzzle and dumping the pieces on the floor. The effect was that millions of e-mail fragments end up unsorted in the server’s unused—or “slack”—space. We searched through all of it to see what was there, and what parts of the puzzle could be put back together.
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”). ..
>This was talking about Guccifer IMHO. WAS NOT ABOUT SETH.. timeline doesn’t add up.
2 separate leakers seperate times?
1 same leaker dif times?
idk
idk this story to well but is interesting where we ended up comey to seth
do you member seeing email saying mueller had seth taken care of?
https://youtu.be/V1XJcBKWVAg
Dr. They - Mini Documentary
It's funny because people think that entertainment TV hides conspiracy theories and FOX TV is milking this fact to help promote the X-Files.
Also, sorry no, this is not really a documentary.
https://youtu.be/ReZJl8rcznk
Mulder's First Twilight Zone Episode | Season 11 Ep. 4 | THE X-FILES
Mulder recounts the first episode of The Twilight Zone he ever watched.
https://youtu.be/lIbPhLdthgQ
The X-Files without the Mengele effect
https://youtu.be/RxiYefeMlek
The Mandela Effect Or A Parallel Universe? | Season 11 Ep. 4 | THE X-FILES