wowza
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9844701/SAGE-Covid-variant-kill-one-three-people.html
https://gettr.com/user/RealGenFlynn
spot on
WW chaos scheduled to coincide with supposed audit results release dates
right on schedule
only a small delay in the grand scheme of things
the more they accelerate the COVID schedule, the more they cause damage to themselves
muh taxes is back!
DOJ rules that IRS must hand over Trump’s tax returns to Congress
https://saraacarter.com/doj-rules-that-irs-must-hand-over-trumps-tax-returns-to-congress/
another case of D5 baiting?
Support for Speaker Pelosi's select Jan. 6 committee waning after first hearing, poll
Findings follow testimony Tuesday by four police officers on duty during the Jan. 6 breach of U.S. Capitol.
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/support-speaker-pelosis-select-jan-6-committee-waning-after-first-hearing-poll
1/6 FF hearings not going as planned for Pelosi it seems
The Morning Consult poll polls released Thursday found 53% of all respondents now support the investigation, down from 66% in the survey in June and 58% just a week ago.
masks creating more havoc
Nearly 1.6 billion disposable masks polluted oceans in 2020, will take 450 years to decompose
Fifty-two billion masks were produced in 2020, and about 1.6 billion entered earth's oceans, according to a new report.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/environment/estimated-16-billion-disposable-masks-polluted-oceans-2020-will-take
interdasting tweet if DS coms
medieval helicopter ref to capt Green?
I suspect the HUBBER/DURHAM train will remain in stealth mode for a while
preliminary awakening through COVID reset + election fraud + maybe other things probably has to come first
when gen pop awoken, DURHAM train will take all the bad actors down
much interdasting
Analysis of the facts (by Gen Flynn):
So what happens if the results of the audit(s) show 2020 election fraud, and that Trump won? What are the potential outcomes?
My sense is that there are three outcomes, along with a set of wildcard possibilities.
Outcome one is that Biden and Harris resign — I see the probability of this as zero, and readers can make their own judgments as to why.
Outcome two is where states present recounted electoral votes to SCOTUS (our illustrious U.S. Supreme Court justices). What happens then?
There are four scenarios.
In scenario one, SCOTUS declares the 2020 election invalid and suggests Congress reconvene and recount electoral votes — Biden and Harris are then replaced.
In scenario two, SCOTUS declares the 2020 election invalid but says the president and vice president remain in office with limited powers to be specified (e.g., no executive orders, no veto power, only perfunctory roles, past executive orders are declared invalid and all are rescinded, and the vice president is not the presidential successor).
In scenario three, SCOTUS declares the 2020 election invalid but the Biden administration remains in office (no loss of powers or authorities).
In scenario four, SCOTUS completely sidesteps the states’ request and does nothing.
If scenario four plays out and SCOTUS sidesteps and avoids their responsibilities to examine the constitutionality of our election systems and processes, then enters 'outcome three. An outcome three decision has responsibility landing square on “states rights” found in the U.S. Constitution.
If this occurs, states have a set of options.
They can reallocate their electoral votes based on the new audit results and replace those within their respective states who were illegitimately elected in 2020, including governors, state legislators and other state officers, as well as replace congressional members at the federal level (members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate).
And a states convention may be immediately held to decide on the presidency and vice presidency.
If the decision is to replace these top two positions, that would be unprecedented in U.S. history.
without expanding much further, remember what I told you about a platform very likely being a trap?
example
the "good guy", "one of us", "fighting for free speech for the m[A]sses", etc.
[J]ust in time for the pelosi hearings
leaving it at that
(pro tip: don't assume anything you say on their new DM system will only be seen by you and the people you're DMing with)
yes about platform
about twatt (and other comped platform), it's always better to only talk in the open
DM chat logs can be photoshoped and used against you
if you only talk in public ways, you avoid these kind of problems, and can document shenanigans
I think "making money" is only a small part of the equation, or even just a cover that could be used to "justify" certain behaviors
actually much shadier than this
think connections, think attacks against specific people, think spreading of narratives strongly deviating from Q but aligning with narratives from associates, in between "patriot-looking/Q-compatible posts", and more
attempts to corrupt GOOD organizations
but leaving it at that, a-la-Jim
>Got a title for next bred?
The Multiplication Of The Precipices Edition