>>1060
>create enough doubt in anons
interesting.
that's exactly what i was accused of last bread, just for posting a reminder in response to a post by archive anon.
it got immediately jumped on as "propaganga", but when i reiterated the timeline and asked what was wrong about it, all i got in response was insults and deflections back to "the war"/factions.
reposted in new bread, tactic now is apparently just to let it slide unnoticed:
>>>/qresearch/11270622
never forget
the Coup Anons who always blame comms took out any and all mentions of the mere existence of the maps and told you they were dead anyway and no one cares even if Q insisted on how they were vital and crucial many times.
they got caught red handed
at first they said it does not matter
it's not important, "no one cares"
but anons were rightly furious at their sabotage
they still squirm and lie to deflect from that.
"anons" jumped on this reminder last bread, said it was propaganda.
quick timeline:
-putsch spends weeks blaming comms for everything
-take over, use this narrative to remove any and all comms links
-due to previous destruction and sabotage operations, the maps weren't even on QR anymore, which is why they stored as backup on comms
-infuriated anons called out the putsch that destroyed links to archives
-putsch got mad, notched things up further still for days and days
-Q asks for a clean ship
โฆ
-you are here.