>>1038
>Title got me wondering if he/they are anarchists.
That is a very good question.
How about Soros anarchists? Paid by the hour anarchists?
>>1042
>pretty sure the plan is to let things stay fucked as much as possible
while blaming others for splitting bakes, etc.
>>1044
>You are being shown how the globalists destroy their lies with chaos
yes. they create enough doubt in anons to make them think it's a "bread war" in the kitch (rather than a manipulated event) so that anons do not defend the "accused" ("comms bakers").
At the same time, they swarm the place with fake anons (blended shills) to express doubt, make comments that embody the 'reasonable assumption' that the lies might be true (bread war exists, bakers up to no good, etc.) - which gaslights ordinary anons who aren't here night and day.
At the same time that anons are beginning to figure out what's sup, they are also leaving the 'toxic work environment' in increasing numbers, to be replaced to shills.
Wonder what the ratio of anons to shills is as this point?
BTW, they are probably going to use blended shills to do exactly the same thing here.
Regarding the shitposters:
I've been on 3 boards that had very few shills (qrb and 2 on endchan). They also had very little 'idle' shitposting or nasty arguments between anons.
Take a look at this thread right now. See any posters who make multiple but empty comments? (((They))) are here already.
This board is their next OP.