/pol/ Miscellaneous bin
Use this thread as a place holder for documents you want to link to on /pol/ or elsewhere. Post any meta shit you want archived here also
thanks anon
2/4
3/4
Should say these are for the catalog, the entire OP is saved for all 25 pages.
4/4
That's all from me, not sure when this raid started so this is the best I can do.
If you find a thread that interests you in either the picture or in the pdfs get the number and try out the URL in archive.is or browse through these listings
https://archive.is/search/?q=https://8ch.net/pol/res/20*
https://archive.is/search/?q=https://8ch.net/pol/res/21*
/POL/ IS UNDER HEAVY ATTACK
ARCHIVE THREADS NOW
Lost Cuckelodeon 4 thread
1/3
Trying this again
Don't be so quick to all of a sudden say "/pol/ is good again.", we haven't seen any significant changes so far, not even in functionality.
>still no .pdf allowed
>still no .swf allowed
>still 3 images
>only fucking board that doesn't have archiving, mods get to pick and choose what gets archived with that retarded sticky, so much for "does not represent the opinions of the moderation"
>still no .pdf allowed
Good, it promotes post board participation like we're seeing here. And it's a massive security issue as well.
>only fucking board that doesn't have archiving
>mods get to pick and choose what gets archived
Users need to take a few extra steps to archive what is important to them and have personal backups that can't be taken down or compromised. And look at what this attack shows, practically nothing is being archived by them. If it weren't for tabs still being left open for screencaps to be made or people using archive.is we'd have nothing. If there are private archives being made of /pol/ nobody has stepped forward to provide copies of them, chances are they aren't being maintained by people that like what /pol/ is.
Depending on a single archive as a solution to this issue is a terrible idea. If this site changes the code slightly that archive stops working, I've seen it happen several times already. That archive has a bit of downtime and the posts aren't archived either. It's a great service but it also gives a false sense of security.
Also my pdfs have a red box where the embedded youtube videos should be and a URL or title for the video isn't provided. There are 111 youtube links in the html file that I'll post here in case anyone wants them.
>Users need to take a few extra steps to archive what is important to them and have personal backups that can't be taken down or compromised.
A lot of them do that by default, even on halfchan which has 4plebs to archive for them. Indeed not as much, but still nonetheless.
>Depending on a single archive as a solution to this issue is a terrible idea.
It is not really a matter of having that purely for archiving purposes, for that you could just use the shit we already have, you could even paste shit in a notepad. The main reason to ever want a special archiving site is so that you could search, filter and analyse, which is something that screencaps and archive.is do not provide. I am the one that looks after the /polarchive/ shill thread and having analytic tools for only 4chan is a pain in the ass.
>If this site changes the code slightly that archive stops working, I've seen it happen several times already. That archive has a bit of downtime and the posts aren't archived either. It's a great service but it also gives a false sense of security.
This I can agree with, but I am certain that quite a few other Anons are also aware of this, as shown by the fact that the GG boards use archive.is even though they already get archives for their board.
It was 111 mentions of youtube not individual videos, here are all the embedded links in order
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18gU4HSkW9Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_xgecR0ifo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pElWcmgVd0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Sm5rpDQrgM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mn7mrEfW10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObTdO_a3bZk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eLHoh7NzM0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21VFUBLikaY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn3Cc1Wu7j4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUH9uyeX6oA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CgQITcfJd0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5LZd2vuzgw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Sx0Wr-uT0s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAcsQeuMrFc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ07CINbFoE
? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6Orgn4rWKMT0vwadtmZu8g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB7Cfmmxm1E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qs7yljgKQy0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqIiKVPdV1A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRaw1A7REzs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mlw2mlf35Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ghw22PCdyRM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N21u3qjNg8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT12WH4a92w
For anybody here who uses a script similar to this one https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/413-youtube-link-title
Go ahead an repost this with all the titles given properly, I don't use youtube unless it's with youtube-dl and it would be to much work for me when someone else can do it in 3-4 clicks.
I just noticed how archives links are dealt with on /pol/ in the sticky after having ignored it for months thinking it was only about /polmeta/. You're absolutely right that the way this is handled on the part of the moderation there isn't functional as an archive. It's working fine as an outdated "best of /pol/" selection of topics for lurkers though.
And I'm only interested in archiving in a manner that makes material available to people who are looking for it and active members of our community. If there is enough demand for something and someone has a private archive and shares it the system works. Screencaps are an important part of our internet heritage that grew out of FAQ files. It's not our job to make future historians or current researchers lives easier, we already have enough on our plate.
pol has been censored from day 1 on 8ch
this isnt the real pol
what made pol pol was a "hands off moderation" and moot defending it as "our glorious bastion of free speech"
8ch pol is a travesty, a jew trap
the BO and his mods can delete and ban whatever they want, and do
"shitposting", "spam", "off topic" are all vague rules designed to be abused
only hotwheels' stance about censorship works for free speech: you only delete what is strictly illegal
pol on 8ch was never good
it serves as a killer of western free speech
<random pdf file
>We need a stronger hand against shitposting, more volunteers (around the clock not only burgers), more active volunteers, volunteers interacting more with the community.
lol
8ch pol was never pol
>what made pol pol was a "hands off moderation" and moot defending it as "our glorious bastion of free speech"
Except that this is not true. The moderation was lax simply due to the fact that the mods rarely bothered to show up and when they did, they often censored actual discussion.
Remember how the sticky was never enforced even when the half/pol/ mods showed up to do something?
Remember how certain topics would become "taboo" for brief periods of time?
Remember cuck porn was allowed to stay on the board when discussion on things like government surveillance would randomly 404 for no reason?
The difference between half/pol/ before GG and full/pol/ now is that half/pol/ mods showed up less frequently, there is no other difference. Full/pol/ is bad not because of censorship but because of blatant inconsistency. /baphomet/ is the definition of a hugbox and yet barely anyone seems to shit on them for it, this is due to the fact that the mods there are consistent in what they want to see on the board and largely people are fine with it. On 8/pol/ you switch between cycles of overmoderation and no moderation whatsoever, the mods didn't do shit to protect against raids but whenever someone said "suspicious", they would get banned, leading to both /pol/acks and non-/pol/acks hating them.
Sandy Hook, Criminalistics Forensic Biology Section Supplemental Report
Ben "Going Reich on the Kike" Garrison's book
Some things an anon made on /pol/ a while back.
Jeffrey Epstein's little black book (redacted)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1508273/jeffrey-epsteins-little-black-book-redacted.pdf
Paul Bernado Investigation Review Summary
Report for Mr Justice Campbell June 1996
The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demography- Stephen Steinlight
With Highlights.
h ttp://cis.org/articles/2001/back1301.html
ISIL defector: we have four nukes.
Document in German
Related Video
https://youtu.be/4n1WsNkHgVc
Mirroring Russia totally hacked us.
>In the Frege Archives at the Institut fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung at Miinster University, there is a typescript of a diary Gottlob Frege kept from 10 March through 9 May 1924. The typescript had been prepared by Frege's son, Alfred, in 1937/38 and sent to Heinrich Scholz in 1938; the whereabouts of the original handwritten diary from which the transcription was created are unknown. The three entries dated 23-25 March which deal with the concept of number have already been published in the Nachgelassene Schriften. The remainder of the diary, which consists primarily of reflections on the political developments of the day, was not published until last year. This first publication of the diary was prepared by Professor Gottfried Gabriel and Dr Wolfgang Kienzler. They made minor corrections to the typescript and furnished explanatory footnotes for the many allusions Frege makes to political figures and events. The annotated diary created by Gabriel and Kienzler appeared in the Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophic 42 (1994), 6, pp. 1067-98 and is translated here with the permission of the authors and the publisher Akademie Verlag. This is the infamous diary Michael Dummett refers to in the introduction to Frege, Philosophy of Language:
> There is some irony for me in the fact that the man about whose philosophical views I have devoted, over years, a great deal of time to thinking, was, at least at the end of his life, a virulent racist, specifically an anti-semite. This fact is revealed by a fragment of a diary which survives among Frege's Nachlass, but which was not published with the rest by Professor Hans Hermes in Frege's nachgelassene Schriften. The diary shows Frege to have been a man of extreme right-wing opinions, bitterly opposed to the parliamentary system, democrats, liberals, Catholics, the French and, above all, Jews, who he thought ought to be deprived of political rights and, preferably, expelled from Germany. When I first read that diary, many years ago, I was deeply shocked, because I had revered Frege as an absolutely rational man, if, perhaps, not a very likeable one. I regret that the editors of Frege's Nachlass chose to suppress that particular item.'
Reposting
Stuff on Eric Clanton
NFP guides, because the mods keep deleting the threads I guess
Sanction program on syria
For a real /pol/ go to vichan.
Haaretz article (locked behind paywall) that details that the UN revealed Israel’s support for ISIS:
(Original article was here at 15 Jan 2015: http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.630359)
Article from Newsweek on how (((climate scientists))) were putting soot on the ice caps to melt them because they thought there'd be another ice age. A dumb fuck up or intentional setup for global warming propaganda? You decide.