Anonymous ID: 41fe25 Dec. 12, 2017, 9:45 p.m. No.11034690   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4749

>>11034651

>Also I'd wager he's a little better than McCain, though not by much.

So why would you want him to win?

>Because he'd vote for Trump's agenda

McCain sure is fighting most of Trump's agenda.

 

I think you've bought too much into the Republican party, most of it is every bit as garbage as the democrats.

Anonymous ID: 41fe25 Dec. 12, 2017, 9:49 p.m. No.11034721   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4746

>>11034694

>we will become a minority

The only thing that's a solace to me is that when it actually comes to war Europeans are simply superior, look at every war's kill to death ratio between Europeans and shitskins and it paints a stark picture. The biggest issue is making sure most of our people aren't so mindfucked that they end up fighting in favor of our deaths.

Anonymous ID: 41fe25 Dec. 12, 2017, 9:57 p.m. No.11034767   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4788

>>11034749

I'm wary of Trump but I don't see why that would matter, just support when he does something good and push back when he starts cucking. Only possible way to get him further right anyways. Still, that wasn't my point, it was that I don't see Brooks as helping Trump's agenda. The opposition republicans are more of a roadblock right now than the democrats.

Anonymous ID: 41fe25 Dec. 12, 2017, 10:14 p.m. No.11034869   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4878 >>4906 >>7975

>>11034831

Would have helped a bit if his wife hadn't left him over this shit. Most of the women I know weren't saying that it had to be true because someone claimed it was, they were saying it was probably true or his wife would have stuck with him.