Anonymous ID: 70063c Dec. 12, 2017, 9:08 p.m. No.11034400   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4412 >>4434 >>4440 >>7258

>>11034356

>>11034365

>>11034369

>how do you justify deleting voting records immediately after an election

You can't justify it. There's no possible reason to destroy records of an official election.

 

Now that I think about it, is this the catalyst to get people marching in the streets? If someone brings up concrete evidence of voter suppression or fraudulent votes and it comes to the public attention, followed shortly by the revelation that, "w-well we destroyed all the records, so there can't be a recount," then the public would fucking explode in rage.

Anonymous ID: 70063c Dec. 12, 2017, 9:13 p.m. No.11034445   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11034419

>Maybe it's about time they did.

When conservatives protest in the street en masse, people will fear for their lives. (((They))) don't want that to happen, so they'll do anything and everything they can do stop it.

 

Maybe it's about time they did.

Anonymous ID: 70063c Dec. 12, 2017, 9:42 p.m. No.11034660   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11034485

>3500 niggers hung for crimes

Fuck, nogs kill more than that in a single year.

 

>>11034513

Using buses to drive people to polls is not illegal. Using buses to drive the same group of people to multiple polling places for the purpose of casting multiple votes is illegal, and you're right, the Democrats have been caught bragging about doing that in the past.

 

>>11034580

Bill got by with rape accusations because nobody brought it to the public eye. If the #MeToo bullshit was happening in the 90's, you had better believe that people would blow up on the allegations, ESPECIALLY when it came out that he lied to the public about the allegations and was subsequently impeached for perjury.

 

They were able to hide that with apologia and other random bullshit stories. Once upon a time, CNN's tactics of reporting about Trump's tweets and his soda-drinking habits probably would have worked since the internet was a twinkle in someone's eye, but with the instant transmission of information, anyone can see anything at any given time and it completely exposes the massive level of bullshit these people pull on a regular basis.

 

>>11034642

You're probably right about a lot of that. Moore lost for a lot of different reasons, but it would still all fall under electioneering, even if some of it is legal. Manipulating people to voting to your preference is still manipulative and shady as fuck.

 

I hope the GOP traitors fucking burn for this.