Anonymous ID: 7bbd5d Dec. 12, 2017, 9:41 p.m. No.11034651   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4690

>>11034620

Brooks would have been a stronger candidate I think. Also I'd wager he's a little better than McCain, though not by much.

The important part is he would vote for Trump's agenda which is all I care about when it comes down to it.

If Jones is seated then senate goes 51-48 which means we can't lose a single republican vote.

Anonymous ID: 7bbd5d Dec. 12, 2017, 9:53 p.m. No.11034749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4767

>>11034690

>I think you've bought too much into the Republican party

I get why you'd think that based on what I said. I agree with you they're both shit. Democracy is shit. Republics only work with a homogenous ethnic majority.

The point about backing Trump's agenda still stands imo because I haven't bought into the concern trolling about Trump.

I still think he's /ourguy/ just doing his best in a world that hates him.

>inb4 bluepilled faggot

You're free to disagree.

Anonymous ID: 7bbd5d Dec. 12, 2017, 10:01 p.m. No.11034788   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11034767

I saw Brooks as someone who would tow the party line and he seemed more electable than Moore. That's all really. Not a huge help to the Trump agenda but he'd be way better than Jones.

Anonymous ID: 7bbd5d Dec. 12, 2017, 10:06 p.m. No.11034815   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11034796

I think in Alabama the law is that the governor chooses a temporary replacement until a special election can be held. Hence why Strange was in the Senate until now.