dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

As someone who has been in your shoes, the professors are bored as shit when most of their students just re-hash what they say (even if they themselves are egalitarian dogmatists), just say this out loud and stir the pot. The professor won't discredit you right away or yell at you in lieu of wanting to incite intellectual discussion and not looking mentally unstable. Just ask "why shouldn't whites be openly racist and advocate for the demographic removal of non-whites"? Just appeal to arguments of self-interest over blind altruism. Ask the innocent questions and keep your cool (people often lose their shit the moment they start talking past a few words in a room that seems hostile); "why should we accept multiculturalism simply because it exists? doesn't it seem like we're being forced to accept equality because the alternative is violence and terrorism?" "aren't whites being put into a situation that necessitates a racist mindset, demographically?" "is believing in racial equality and being white in a multicultural society not a form of stockholm syndrome?" Being Socrates as such won't get you forced into drinking hemlock, it will just make the professor more excited to come to class and your fellow students more baffled. Just stick to facts, basic questions, and a point of view of self-interest. No one can discredit you for not wanting to be replaced without resorting to disingenuously calling you a conspiracy theorist, so be ready for that. I had multiple professors tell me that whites are becoming a minority by 2050. Use facts like that against them.

Anonymous ID: f68e63 Aug. 2, 2019, 7:46 a.m. No.13558163 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>8367

>>13557842

>Progressivism and modernity are definitely European concepts, but what purpose did it have before becoming the degenerate materialist religion that we know of today?

The rejection of arbitrary monarchy, monarchies that implicitly condoned decadence and corruption, and being a sycophantic fop. What was at first very innocent, an affirmation of freedom and self-determination, was exploited by Northeastern Puritans (jews in germany, like Marx, were the exceptional but few) to advocate for sentiments that are entirely counter-intuitive to the self-interest of European peoples. Idealism overcame realism, Lincoln is the epitome of everything that went wrong, but Cromwell was the cornerstone of that rigid egalitarian idealism that destroys everything in it's path. It's not coincidence that the Gilded age of monopolies, mass immigration, the opening of Ellis Island, and the attempt to reconcile southerners with the Spanish-American War came all around the same time. Zionism kicked off around that time as well. Communism and capitalism have the same goal: to liberate the elite from the confines of tradition and to cement multiculturalism within national boundaries. Progressive liberals of today are just a freak hybrid of FDR's New Deal liberalism and the ex-communists (some of which were in the Frankfurt school) of Chicago. You start with John Dewey's educational reforms, needless wars against Germans, Churchill's demagogic fuckery, and then Goldwater's pathetic but ultimately successful (through Nixon, Reagan, Bush and now Trump) attempt to appropriate nationalism with pseudo-racism, using family values to shill for gun control, pro-Israel rhetoric combined with legitimate christcuckery, all the while professing the benefits of immigration for growing corporations. At the ass end of all of this you have present day SJWs, a gross irony due to their legitimate yet totally impotent anti-capitalism at Occupy (a response to jews fucking with the American economy, like Larry Summers and Alan Greenspan) but simultaneously blind affirmation of racial equality and feminist bullshit that was exposed in the BLM riots and their denial of Michael Brown's actions leading up to his death. So now you've got progressive liberals who have this awkward relationship with capitalism and immigration, and pseudo-conservative magapedes who pretend to love nationalism while blindly arguing for more capitalism and legal immigration on the other. It's amazing that this board, much less the NDSAP ever existed at all given how much critical thought (and an understanding of the importance of race in a time when people only dare talk of economics) is required of it and how little of such critical thought is actually allowed to exist on or off the internet due to the increasing regulation of the internet.