Have some random comments.

>>13507677

>My guess is you sperged out with that IP to get it deleted by some other mod precisely because you wanted the last one deleted.

Yes he did. Check his post hsitory from time to time and you'll figure it out why some just slam B&D+. I'd comment on it but you know…

Oh yeah I just saw the ban appeal. 100% him and I don't even need to see more than that one post to know why it was done.

>I don't know what US code you're referring to but its rather easy to google that kind of shit.

Dunno what you're exactly responding to but even the rules state that we're untrained volunteers and now lawyers. We aren't official moderators of 8chan. Not even the globals are. I don't know US law and I don't care much to learn. I act on my best judgement and that is CP is illegal and I'm not bothering with any grey line. All else I simply leave alone for someone else.

>You must now ban these users and remove all of their posts.

The very second this starts I just don't understand why you even engage with him. I'm a few miles to apathetic to ever powertrip but some autist has no business to commandeer us around. Filter and move on. Makes the thread that much nicer to read.

>I don't give a fuck if you believe it or not but the report queue is partially broken. I have seen all the reports randomly vanish when I was rather confident I was the only mod active.

Can confirm this one. Makes me wonder if the que is hosted on the media server sometimes. Heh.

>I believe I am the only mod who will still try to actively engage because I do think it's beneficial to be as transparent as practical.

The people who care aren't posting here mostly. I thought the same once but in between the gag rules we've got and the fact that a meta thread regular is usually a faggot, as seen here, I stopped bothering a long time ago. Frankly the only reason I read this thread nowadays is for your posts.

>>13509406

You reported the reason. Welcome to the correct thread.

>>13509308

>larpmod talks with other larpmod admitting he sees himself above actual users

Yes? I have the funny buttons, you do not. I am literally above you. This isn't me powertripping, I give far to little fucks to even bother, but I'm not here to be commanded around either. Well, except by codemonkey I suppose, but then again so are you.

So if some faggot screeches around I care just as much as any other anon who gets autistically screeched at. Enough to ignore them and little more.

>>13509642

They literally did. Posted screencaps itt, one stickied them. At least one's on nanochan and that place was founded by another (who since fucked off for whatever reason).

>>13509716

>Until you show any proof of you actually being a mod (and no, arbitrarily banning someone for no reason or finding one post that might possibly, if you stretch it so far it becomes transparent, break some rule, is not a legitimate option) you're about as trustworthy as Q or Q2: Purpleanon.

Difference being those two get booted from here, one of the reasons I applied in the first place.

But no. We're not allowed to, thus the source for all of this is my samefagging ass as far as you know. Thing is, you can see if what's written makes sense or not. I can say I'm being honest and as this is an anonymous imageboard, that's all you're ever going to get.

>>13509621

Add the fact that the entire OP is the very definition of a meta thread so even disregarding all you said which is true it still belongs in here and not in yet another "this place sucks wat do" thread.

But thank you, someone like you I can actually work with.