I personally refrain from usin the pejorative "Christcucks" because it disparages Christ. Christians themselves are an unsightly stain on Jesus' good name, so calling them "Cuckstains" is a much better alternative.
Christ is cool. Christianity is not.
Even if you were correct (you are not) it would not be the world-changing chain of events you believe it would be. The Ancient Israelites if they were not dirty jews, were still an irrelevant backwater group of deluded Abrahamites who cooked up a false history for themselves to make themselves appear more relevant than they actually were. Israelite slavery in Egypt? Never happened. Moses? Never existed. Adam and Eve? Did not exist either. Noah's (Utnapishtim's) Flood? Complete fantasy.
The fact they were subjected to the Babylonian Captivity should be enough proof they were a weak race of slaves, unfit for even slavery. Even if they were White as snow, they were pathetic and not a group to look up to.
And you even admit they were erased and supplanted by a collection of foreign tribes that lived nearby. This means they're all dead and have no importance in our world.
Look you fucktarded Abrahamite, you can believe WE WUZ JEWZ all day long, but the second you start making claims about the planet and its history that contradict the actual evidence and all objective reality like the Old Testament does, you're crossing a line. No the planet was not covered in water on the same level as Kamino or some shit, and no Israelites were ever kept as slaves in White Egypt in the scale the false Book of Exodus depicts.
But they don't. You have no idea what you're talking about.
>flood only covered the Middle-East
That contradicts what the Bible says.
The problem with Christian Identity is that it is diametrically opposed to any European Heathen heritage, labelling the Old Gods and the ones who honor them "demonic" and making baseless claims like that the Old Ways are non-White. It is a purely Abrahamitic position, and instills a Christian identity rather than a truly Racial identity. The only thing separating it from Steven "godly niggers" Anderson levels of nigger-loving is that it uses weak justification from scripture to denounce miscegenation - which isn't good enough. To properly denounce miscegenation, you must look to objective reality like medical conditions and health concerns associated with mulattoes - not to some bronze age book cooked up by mudbeard goatfuckers.
I mean the memorial doesn't violate the Establishment Clause because the Cross predates the filthy Christianist Abrahamitism for many thousands of years. I support this much, but let's say for instance there was a Nativity Scene with Joseph the sandnigger cuck and his wife and her son Jesus on government property. Then that would be something worth taking down, because it very explicitly violates the Establishment Clause - and many court decision support that much.
Speaking of which, I'm going to donate to the Freedom From Religion Foundation.