>>13410222

The ancient Israelites were not kikes, and kikes are not their legitimate descendents. The White descended primarily from the ancient Israelites of the Old Testament. When Christ said "I have only come for the lost sheep of the house of Israel", he was talking about those tribes which had wandered or been transplanted into Europe, because that's where they went.

The kikes are descended from various nonwhite tribes who lived near the ancient Judean tribe, who had adopted a perverted version of their religion, culture, and language.

http://archive.fo/zOCcq

http://archive.fo/Qkdys

http://archive.fo/YEyb0

http://archive.fo/ULU32

http://archive.fo/R7GOO

http://archive.fo/KwkFB

>>13410284

You asked for an answer, and you got one. There is historical basis for it, and it's absolutely true if you'd bother to read it yourself instead of knee-jerkingly brushing it off.

Also

>all those links are from the same author, so his inherent bias is apparent

That means nothing. You might as well say

>I can't believe anything Hitler said in Mein Kampf, he's the one who wrote it and his bias is apparent

Both statements are equally stupid.

>>13410454

>The Ancient Israelites if they were not dirty jews, were still an irrelevant backwater group of deluded Abrahamites

Incorrect, they are the ancestors of the European-White peoples.

>who cooked up a false history for themselves to make themselves appear more relevant than they actually were. Israelite slavery in Egypt? Never happened. Moses? Never existed. Adam and Eve? Did not exist either. Noah's (Utnapishtim's) Flood? Complete fantasy.

Incorrect. Yahweh created this world, and the events of the Old Testament, and the New, (which are both Aryan-only racial texts) are absolutely true.

>And you even admit they were erased and supplanted by a collection of foreign tribes that lived nearby. This means they're all dead and have no importance in our world.

The White Judahites were absorbed into the Greeks, but some racemixed with the Canaanites, Edomites, and other nonwhite tribes, eventually racemixing themselves out of existence and that bastardized amalgam is what we know as jewry.

>>13410571

All of the historical and archeological records support my claim, though.

Regarding the flood, it wasn't worldwide, it only covered the region of the Middle-East and Near East, and its' surroundings.

>>13410748

>But they don't. You have no idea what you're talking about.

I provided multiple links, all of which cite historical and archeological accounts. You should read them instead of brushing them off like a nigger.

>That contradicts what the Bible says.

No, it doesn't, it only contradicts the church's interpretation of it. The ancient Hebrew word 'eretz' just means 'land, region, geographical area', it wasn't a synonym for the whole planet, and that's the word that was used for describing where the flood took place; across the land wherein Noah and the peoples of that region dwelt.