>>13582660

>I will probably just start without rules and when it becomes clear we need some, open a general to discuss them and then I will implement them using the OpenBSD-style benevolent dictatorship hybrid regime but get this - the more rules there are, the more I would have to do or delegate which is precisely the opposite of what I want to do, which is to come in once a day or so and do a sweep up. I could see a 'no porn or gore OR ANIME without spoilering the images' rule being part of the culture here through hiding, shunning, etc. but I don't want to sit around all day doing shit about it unless it becomes a problem.

someone should do something like what youre saying, you have to be completely neutral and centrist though

>>13582855

>The old threads are going to be anchored then you will be able to archive them before deletion. The idea is to invigorate what was until recently a TOTALLY DEAD board. We're not leaving up shit from 6+ years ago as a sort of eternal grave to old /pol/. You can always make a new board here to save every thread you like and even make new threads and keep the memory alive forever. But these threads are beyond dead, they are turning to dust and there are way too many of them.

To give contrast to me using halfs, I would always view threads by reply count since the board moves so fast, and that way i dont have to see any bait and crap threads only the ones that were most replied to that day until bump limit. Because the spam and bait threads got so bad over time, it was the only way to view it other than using filters. Here it is half the board very old threads or threads i dont care about, using reply count as a view.

Oh i just realized you can hide threads on the main board, thats at least useful, you cant hide threads on that soyjack site which is gay and fake