Don't forget >>303351 with
>This is democracy!
>The political party I disagree with should be disbanded!
Makes you wonder what she even thinks democracy is, when she thinks it shouldn't apply to those she disagrees with.
Don't be silly man, that episode was years ago.
Not only is she also a reality tv star, isn't she also one of the richest people in the country, due to her book club and talk show?
It seems to me like she has nothing more in common with the people on who's behalf she wants to talk than Hillary Clinton. Just another rich and privileged old hag trying to paint herself as political leader who speaks for the little people. And just an disingenuous.
Whats with all the hating on Norway all of a sudden? Is there a severe crime spree being committed by Viking immigrants or something?
>1st pic
>Complains about old accomplished writers treating her like an amateur.
>Writing credit:
<Equestria Girls, and not even the movies either but those annoying little webisode things.
Gee I wonder why they don't look up to that great artistic accomplishment…
If she is dumb enough to aggressively fight for a political movement that actively wants to replace her with someone else with a more politically acceptable skin color, then let her reap what she has sown.
DO IT FAGGOT!
Also, now a days BLM wants to segregate schools so that black kids don't have to put up with white people.
https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/25748/
I suspect the irony is entirely lost on them…
And those silly yankees seriously starting a congresional hearing over whether or not the president used a naughty word?
Are these people so devoid of any kind of real criticisms of Trump or just plain fucking perspective that they will try to kick up a fuzz over literal semantics?
Who am I kidding. Of course they are.
>1st pic
Doesn't that just mean the Democrats where hypocrites when they complained about the republicans being so unwilling to compromise they would sooner see the government shut down than accept the other guys budget proposal?
Cause it sure as fuck seems that way to me.
I think he's refering to this:
http://archive.is/P5if9
Personally I'm all for such an organisation. Not because I'm religious, but because if you have any reason think the surgeon who's about to preform a tripple bypass operation on you may think you are heretical infidel who deserves to die but is being forced to do the operation, would you trust him not to have an "accident" during the operation?
Simply put I don't see anything good coming from forcing a doctor to treat a patient he does not want to help.
Besides isn't a doctor refusing to preform procedures they are morally opposed to, much the same as a someone choosing to be a conscientious objector when summoned for military service?
Of course Poles don't mind arrogant american cunts comming over and pretending like they are part of the events, despite being the descendend's who ran off instead of fighting against the nazi's and then pretend only jews died in those camps..
Who wouldn't like meeting people like that?
>The bureaucracy that lost all the blatantly incriminating emails from Hillary's illegal server in the middle of the election.
True, the NSA may be a clusterfuck beyond compare, but at least they aren't the FBI.
What worries me most in this whole thing isn't the just the blatant partisanship of one of the most important law enforcement agencies in the US, but that this partisanship has put it into direct conflict with the government, and that it was this way since even before the administration came into power.
How this isn't seen as a major threat to the proper functioning of a democracy is beyond me.
Now that I put some thought into it this brings up some scary parallels to the roman empire.
They also had a group who was responsible for enforcing the law, the praetorians, who also got highly involved in the politics of the empire and trying to interfere with it.
This kind of shit was what led to the downfall of the Roman empire.
Anyone taking bets on how long till the US gets the year of the 4 emperors?
>Pic 2
Is she conflating the #MeToo campaign with environmentalism?
I mean, what else could she possibly mean by "to rape the environment"?
>Pic 2
>literally anything else
>litterally
What about asian billionaires? Black rap stars? People who live in countries where "white christian conservative" isn't the majority?
I know what she's trying to say, but dammit, she's supposed to be a fucking writer. Is being able to make coherent sentences or use English words correctly really too much to ask of her?
>5th pic
Imagine if games where treated as art, as the journalists want it to be.
Imagine if instead of complaining about developers not making the games they want and taking bribes for good reviews, the journalists just reported what is actually in the games.
Imagine if the journalists had ethical standards and didn't try to cover it up with another journalist was caught getting sexual favours for good reviews.
The difference is that they don't actually treat it as art. They aren't even trying to.
Can you imagine what would happen some art critic said the Mona Lisa needed to be redone with a different skin color in the name of diversity? He'd be laughed right out of the art community.
Instead of a game like hatred getting pulled from steam and condemned for spreading hate, it would be a comment on violence in our society and our own willingness to indulge it against those we do not like.
>Thats what the native Americans where saying in 1600
And look where they are now.
Careful there richard, Saying that men need to be acknowledged in any positive way sounds dangerously like wrong think.
Also, just how many gay fathers does he even think are around?
>pic 1
Isn't the problem in her sons case, that someone else chose to break the law by attacking him, rather than that the attacker happened to have a gun?
Would she be knives banned if the attacker had had a knife? Or metal pipes if the attacker had a pipe wrench?
Its tragic her son had to die because some asshole was willing to kill over a noise complaint or whatever, but doing so is already illegal AFAIK. The gun changes nothing, if it was even a legal firearm.
This is what you get when you choose an artist for their skin color rather than their competence.
Sure, he can swing a brush, but he is also clearly tone-deaf to the style those portraits are made in.
And lets not draw attention to the whole "choosing an artist because of his skin color totally isn't racist gais" thing…
The irony is that in 50 years, that portrait will likely be one of the most important pictures anyone has of him. And he chose to make it some abstract piece instead of a naturalistic portrait like every else has. Gotta wonder what that will make the people of the future think of him…
>Boys are broken
You don't suppose its because they are lashing out against a society that treats this as gospel?
Also, who is Jennifer San Marco, Andrea Yates, Priscilla Joyce Ford, Amy Bishop and Sylvia Seegrist?
concerning barak's portrait, I found an article going into detail with just how fucked up it is.
And its not just "it has an ugly background and doesn't fit in" levels of degeneracy we are talking about here.
http://archive.is/lxJc8
The archive link doesn't do it justice unfortunately, since it didn't get any of the pictures showing what is being talked about.
Here's the link to the original site, for those that want to see the pictures too.
https://www.sankakucomplex.com/2018/02/16/obama-sperm-portrait-made-in-china/
To make a long story short, the artist in question not only has a long tradition of putting sperm into his pictures, copy pasting the backgrounds, moved his studio to china so he could pay less for assistants and normally plagiarises other famous pictures, substituting the white men depicted with black gangsta's, but also depicting black women with the severed heads of white women as part of the "kill the whitey thing".
I guess we should consider ourselves fortunate Michele didn't end up with Ivanka's severed head in her hands…
The US has a murder rate of 5.3 per 100.000 citicens as of 2016
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-1
For comparison, Sweden, in the midst of gangwar and rapefugee flood, has a rate of 1.07, with 106 murders in 2016 and a total population of 9.9 million.
https://www.bra.se/bra-in-english/home/crime-and-statistics/murder-and-manslaughter.html
Germany had a rate of 2.9 with 2418 murders in 2015 in a country of 82 million
https://www.bka.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Publications/PoliceCrimeStatistics/2016/pks2016FlyerEnglish.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3
England and Wales (not the entirety of the UK, not sure why they didn't have that at their Office for National Statistics) had a murder rate of .99 with 571 murders in a population of 58 million (again, just for England and Wales, so not including Scotland and North Ireland.)
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/yearendingmarch2016/homicide
Long story short, yes, the murder rate in the US is very high compared to europe. For a murder rate in the US for just the white population, I don't know where to find those numbers.
It might also be wise to keep in mind that the murder rate in the US changes a lot, by state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_crime_rate
The Pro-Slaughter Agenda?
Do these people honestly think anyone who questions gunlaws or the left using a massacre of children to push their political agendas in the most cynical of ways, is fighting FOR more massacres?
webm related for what this logic results in
So she's complaining about how her potential customers are the wrong skin color, gender and sexual preference, which makes them automagically hateful, and when she tells them as much she ends up having to block them.
So tragic.
Bitch, maybe you should try to ask why you are this bad at communicating with the people you are trying to sell comics to in the first place instead of bragging about having banned 10.000 potential fans. Can you imagine a restaurant treating its customers like that? How long do you think they'd stay in business?
Explain to me how this isn't extortion and a clear violation of the NRA's First Amendment Rights to push a political agenda when you all try to force any company that has any kind of relationship with the NRA to pull out.
All Delta Airlines lost was a potential tax break, specific to them, from conservative politicians, that they where getting because of they offered special discounts to NRA members flying to NRA conventions. The real question in this case should probably be "why should Delta Airlines get a tax break no other company gets in the first place?"
Seing as the kid is a niglet, it would seem like a reasonable assumption that the parents of said kid are thus niggers. Considering this, negligent parenting should hardly be surprising.
>3
So is this roughly how Tara's logic is running here?
>Damned democratic system, how dare they only elect 12 women out of 107 candidates. It must be some kind of state wide conspiracy of everyone to not elect women!
>It would be so much easier if they could just skip the whole election process and just appoint their left wing numales and trans, genderfluid, lesbian, handicapped people who identify as Native American, to the legislature directly instead, or something. Most of those voters are white and straight anyway, so they shouldn't even be allowed to vote in the first place!
>resist inequality
Says the woman who has spend her entire life in the 1%
>insist on a better world
How can anyone say that with a straight face, considering her track record?
>persist against all odds
Remember webm related? That sure was against all odds.
Seriously Tara, what has that woman done to actually make the world a better place? Ever?