Fake news.
Try to understand the effect the muhjoo shill posts have on normies: "QAnon hates jews"
This is why we tell them about it beforehand.
Telling people to filter shills is not shilling.
We are here to go after criminals and those who would control us and subvert our mission. That includes plenty of Jews, non-Jews, and muhjoo shills. Hint: it's because they're criminals and perverts, not because they're Jews specifically.
I'm open to constructive suggestions for what to put in that space on wearethene.ws/about instead, but so far I haven't seen any, just a bunch of whining.
I am waiting for qresearch to stabilize a bit. Site will be back soon.
The biggest issue IMO is keeping shills from baking their own notable buns with bunch of garbage in them, thanks to FartJack it's now easier than ever for shills to bake.
Yes, will likely go with some kind of merging of all notable buns posted for each thread, and human verification will probably be needed also since there is no longer a chain of trust from Q BO > bakers.
I don't want (((Friendly Reminder))) bullshit appearing on the site. Shit that is posted every. single. bread is not notable, and including it detracts from what we are trying to do.
wearethene.ws is just an aggregator. The purpose of the site is to present and archive anons' work in a more readable format, not to take credit for it and "become the next drudge". I'm interested in normies (and eventually historians) being able to easily look at what we dig up, not in building some huge money-making thing.
Filtered.
@8bit: if you have had repeated issues with BVs then this suggests to me you need to address problems earlier, when the first warning signs appear, instead of waiting until shit hits the fan.
Whatever happens, you are not alone.
Some ideas:
Stay in communication, note any disagreements between BO/BVs and resolve them early, and be willing to teach others how to moderate well.
"When the first warning signs appear". For example, a BV taking action without consulting with others, especially if what they did seems controversial to (real, non-glowing) anons.