The Wing Coven

Have anons seen this? I found it on qresearch, and my immediate thought is that this could put a whole different meaning on Potus' WITCH HUNT tweets.

>>>/qresearch/7057439

I don't recall ever seeing any digs on The Wing Coven. How is it we've missed it? Or maybe I just missed the digs - it is difficult to catch everything even being on here 12 hours a day or more.

Anyway, if anyone is interested, here is the link to the article.

https://doitq.news/the-wing-coven/

And, additionally, what do you think of this site - DOItQ News? Looks like it has some pretty good resources, but is it run by Patriots or Paytriots? I'd be interested in anons' opinions.

https://doitq.news/

>>11403

I scrolled through it pretty quickly, but there are several familiar names mentioned. I also thought about Q's "follow the wives" posts. Makes me wonder how many may be members of The Wing Coven.

>>11407

Yes, I've seen references before. What's alarming about this article is how organized the group is and the plans to go mainstream.

>>11408

Yes, "coven" is bad. No doubt they'll be hiding that as they go mainstream. Only inner circles will know the true goal.

>>11407

>>11391

>>11403

More on The Wing...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wing_(workspace)

Less than 3 years, and they've raised $117.5 Million in funding, and expanded to have 6 locations. Wow. Am I wrong that the growth seems to be at warp speed?

>>11431

Yes, we should pray often, Anon. This has always been a war between good and evil, and I think we understand this better than most.

>>11444

Yes, it's members only access to their site. Anyone want to cough up a couple hundred bucks and become a member? Not I.

>>11455

Red Letter Day.

>>11462

>Real Life Drama

It most certainly fits.

>>11444

Here's a link to the site that will allow you to explore a little.

https://www.the-wing.com/

I'm also getting a really bad vibe. I don't like it. They mention having a full calendar of "events" yet there's nothing about these events on the site.

>>11479

Looks like you're good to go.

But I'd have to agree with >>11481

Kek.

>>11485

And here's Janda talking about Epstein being a Deep State tool for blackmailing and owning politicians. This is Part One.

https://youtu.be/ohI2c-r4IPI

I'll embed Part Two next post.

>>11493

>>11485

Part Two

https://youtu.be/iVR0ees7XLA

>>11489

>>11510

Can't find anything but the same request last month. Was that you?

I don't remember Q ever responding to a post about Crenshaw, but my memory sucks most times.

Q post on Q Research.

>>>/QResearch/7059125

New Q

>>>QResearch/7059278

>>11762

>>>/QResearch/7059278

Sorry

>>11916

Banning him from posting on social media does not prevent him from contacting people.

>>11959

Gag orders are imposed by courts all the time, it’s not suppression of free speech. When you’re on a jury, you’re prohibited from discussing the case. That’s not a suppression of free speech.

Stone’s gag order is for posting on social media, and I can’t necessarily disagree with the judge. He pushed the limits on that.

Again, social media is not the only avenue of communication, and he’s only banned from social media.

>>12019

They are two totally separate issues. Potus’ twitter account is deemed to be a public forum, so he can’t block anyone. (BTW - I’m waiting for someone to sue other public figures for blocking them on twitter. Saw one of the “Squad” recently blocked someone.)

Stone is involved in a criminal case and had violated the gag order that prohibited him from speaking publicly about his case. So now he’s banned from using his social media accounts at all. It’ll be lifted when his case is over.

Apples and oranges.