>Sorry anon's but I can't post over there anymore. It feels too creepy and I can't stop my skin from crawling when I do.
i feel ya.
it just stinks in there, it's sad
pretty much same thing.
but much more direct frontal approach against Q.
BO abusing power, claiming "new q posts are fake", etc.
here's graphics from 2 migrations, not the whole story but should help
sad to re-read these, now.
back then Q went to pol, called out the compd, etc.
i guess it's not as strategically important now... details of the plan are far beyond me
> eerily similar to what happened with notables on qresearch.
>Nothing was broken, but the BO decided to make a unilateral decision to change something in order to "make it better", while actually doing the exact opposite.
EXACTLY
oh man i remember that... i was so pissed at the needless change.
remember when they made a SUPER DUPER EXTRA SECURE MEGATRIP for Q, because of course they knew better than Q team what was better and safer for Q?
Q never touched it with a thousand foot pole... and anons (me included) got posts deleted & banned just stating maybe Q didn't want any other trip than what he was using...
gee
i wonder what country accepted her & saved her from dangerous Somalia & let her become a policital leader
repost from qr
>>>/qresearch/7060310
>>>/qresearch/7060320
there's been some doubles deleted n shit.
this is why having multiple parallel archive sites (AND KEEPING THEM IN THE DOUGH) helps.
provides redundancy to verify.
now
if anons want to go and deep dive this
you have to go through the graphic map archives in comms.
yes, the static images, un-text-searchable, & have to count manually.
but those aren't and can't be fucked with in a similar way
ok so just one post away isn't too concerning.
my guess is old cap from before a double was deleted.
best verification bet i'd guess is ss anon's archive, not as much work as going through the graphic jpg maps (though those could help confirm once disputed post is found)
>>>/qresearch/7060401