https://www.bitchute.com/video/siplk9h7xBBQ/

>Q

Clif High's take on why Trump's saying what he has about the jab

What High's saying is that Trump is very precise in the words he chooses and is somewhat of a code-talker. He's suggesting that Trump's message wasn't actually directed at his "awake" supporters, or what High refers to as "Woo People", but rather at the sleeping Normies who've bought the vax narrative, hook, line, and sinker. According to Clif High, Trump's words should never be taken at face value and need to be parsed in order to determine their true meaning.

I concur with Clif High's reasoning on this. Trump knows his supporters are dead-set against the jab, and I'm sure he was aware of the backlash that would come from sounding like a cheerleader on the issue, so there must be a strategic reason for him to be talking about it at all. I don't think it's to convince us to take it, because I'm sure he must know that, that is simply not going to happen. In fact, many of us are ready to go to war if they keep pushing. So the fact that he keeps talking about it, after getting booed, means that there must be something else going on.

I've shared a similar view on this, and even went as far as to say that I don't believe Trump will start talking truth on the Jab until he's back in office and has his hands on the levers of power. The reason why I'm able to see this, is because I realize that we are at War, and I am thinking strategically rather than emotionally.

For Trump to retake the White House, he has to unite the People and not just tell his base what they already know. Sure, hearing Trump come out against the Jab would certainly "feel good", but what effect would that have on the sheep who've already gotten the suicide-shot?

We all know that when the sheep finally understand what's been done to them, they'll lose their shit and burn the entire system to the ground. If this happens in America while the globalists have the reins of power, the United States will completely collapse. Which despite the "feel good" thought of some of the perpetrators of this Covid-Crime getting torn to pieces by an angry mob, it would be short-lived as the CCP swooped in and took full advantage of a completely nonfunctioning United States government.

The timing of this part of the #GreatAwakening has to be perfect, and it has to be done in such a way that inspires hope. If the jabbed believe they're under a death sentence, they'll go on the war path. So when this happens, they either need to be too weak to do anything, or the news has to be delivered with hope for treatment. How could that happen with Biden in office?

>>117556

I still disagree with this

"oh noes, when he said he got vaxxed, he actually meant HCQ".

Yes, that may be the case, still playing stupid riddle games with your voter base when it's about death and diseases is just retarded, sorry.

"Oh noes the media said HCQ is dangerous and kills people" (obvious lies), yes, so?

Call the media out on that shit instead.

So what's the end game

"Uh I'm so curious what Trump actually meant"

"What? It was HCQ again? That's deadly, we heard it in 2020"

What's the point, I really don't get it.

>>117558

Yes, the point is that Trump is pushing "the vaccines", and he even doesn't say "vaccine" all the time, sometimes it's plural, sometimes it's not. Even if it's secret code, why would I give a shit about secret codes? This is actually not a game.

I wouldn't take any of that shit regardless what he or "Q" says. But what I complain about is not about me, but about normie voters, who trust him and believe him.

The only logic behind it that I somewhat see is that it breaks the leftie narrative about "orange man bad, always do opposite of what orange man does", but well it's Trump#s vaccines already, so that goes out of the window too.

WHAT would be interesting if Trump pushed it, while Bidan backpedaled. I still wouldn't really see the point.

If I still want to hang onto "Trump good", then maybe he was actually replaced with a clone.

Or wait, one possibility: Trump was in the cabal, was meant to win back in 2016, but is against what they had planned, while at the same time HAS to pretend that everything is going according to "THE PLAN". That makes the most sense. It would still be bad, but it would be understandable in a way..

Or maybe he actually wants to destroy himself as a "leader figure", because where we are going there shouldn't be "leader figures". Still I really don't get it. There would be better ways.

>>117556

Oh and the 2020 to 2030 narrative doesn't really make sense.

World bank set a time frame for "COVID" for 5/6 years, not 10 years.

Maybe they had the vaxx planned for 2024/2025, and yeah they could have sprayed poison over certain cities to create "covid outbreaks" for years with their aerosol injection planes, but is that for certain?

This right now worked quite well, so many fell for the stupid shit, for the most obvious lies, so why wait years instead?

Poison people over time also makes sense. You don't want to make it obvious. That way you get the "best" outcome, plus anti-vaxxers will be anti-vaxxers regardless, and can be used to blame for lockdowns or new shots.

You could even reinforce vaccines by actually releasing some poison shit that your "vaccine poison" actually protects from, bam anti-vaxxers gone and sheep even more brainwashed than before.

When you control big pharma, you can do so much evil shit and it's easy too.

Just put some extra poison into SOME of the flu vaxx batches and there you go. A "covid" outbreak on demand.