MOAR FROM UK BREAD ON CORINTHIA HOTEL PICS BEING HAND-HELD AND NOT TRAF_CAM

(RE-POST FROM UK BREAD)

(Hope it’s not duplicated here but I just posted this post was missing on End so posted it there.)

Reference vidcap for CH1 elevation.

This shows pretty gud elevation match with CH1 but the angle is wrong. The camera holder paused on about the 5th step above the 3rd landing while descending on the building side of the stairway, seemingly leaning against the glass railing.

Check the top of the lamp posts. Four are relative for gauging elevation with this vidcap, A, B, C, D.

Also compare the sign posts inside the white rectangle, labeled F.

Lamp posts E and G are not useful in this comparison but are useful in comparison with other vidcaps for other CH Q pics.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

This elevation reference vidcap might suggest that CH1 was taken on the stairway rather than on the footbridge near the elevator and near the trafcam pole. Need to weight that with the potential matches based on angles and other geometry as per previous SV images discussed above. Lamp post G is of particular significance and compares with same in ROT3. (End)

(IMPORTANT- TO A FINDING OF PICS BEING HAND-HELD VS. TRAFCAM) Pay close attention to the lamp posts/sign posts in the pics. Compare where they are in height compared with the CH behind them. This means of determining height of the camera is especially important when the picture might have been taken in a general proximity to the ‘trafcam’ at the top of the stairs to Hungerford Bridge. The trafcam pole in question is situated atop an elevator structure and atop a pole above that. So, even if an operator is taking a pic directly below the trafcam pole, there may be some 10-15 feet difference in height which will be a noticeable difference.