Anons, I have been working for some weeks on a dig and posting piece by piece.

The prior installments begin here, pb: >>115813, >>116087, >>117057, >>118140, >>118638 and the last is here: >>118639

In all honesty, I have been working on this quite directly for quite some time prior to that (reading, planning, taking notes, etc).

In a deeper sense I have been "working" on this for several years now with the whole "Q" thing.

And like others, I think I have been working on it many years prior to that.

The basic topic of my dig has been DOJ stuff.

There are surely others who know the fine details much better than I do.

(And I have surely relied on the work of many, even if I cannot acknowledge them all.)

But I have been aiming to "step back" and look at the bigger DOJ "show" from a broader Q-informed perspective.

I think that in some deep sense these "big picture" ideas like "God wins", "Trust the plan", "Patriots in control" and so on are right.

So I have been trying to rethink some of the earlier DOJ stuff while keeping these ideas in mind (even if we seem to live in the Biden/Covid world now).

I have gotten a few responses and my posts have been in the QRB notes.

(I don't post on QR as I was banned for pointing out reasons that some "fake Q" posts might be legitimate.

I don't want to play whackamole with VPNs when I can be doing digs.

I suspect Q leaves those idiots "in charge" to create the appearance of weakness and to spur anons to find new outlets.

But some very good anons are still posting there and I do thank them for some "catches" that I use in this graphic.

This is really a common effort.)

Anyway, I am offering this long "intro" as I am quite flabbergasted by what I have found.

I have tried to include all the details in the graphic, but if you compare with my prior posts, you will see at once that this is far more complex.

I could probably do a better job of organizing things, but "the perfect is the enemy of the good" and I figured I should try to get this like 90% good and post.

As you will see if you read my prior posts (the most recent), I have argued from various bases that James Comey is actually a white hat.

(The two crucial facts are that he played a key role in enabling Trump to win in 2016, and also that his promotion of "Russiagate" led to a DEFEAT for the black hats.)

But as I was endeavoring to construct some "decode" graphics akin to those I previously posted on Flynn and Pence, an astounding array of things just started clicking and coming together.

Here are the higlights:

1) All of Comey's tweets since "Biden became President" seem linked to Q posts.

2) Multiple recent posts by inside players (Dan S, Melania, US Army) connect to Comey's posts.

3) Comey's comments about a life-changing encounter in his youth with an attempted rapist seem to "unlock" multiple comms.

4) The Battle of Midway (tide-turning battle in the Pacific War) seems to unlock mutliple comms. ("Watch the water.")

On the surface these things seem to have little to do with each other, but that is what is somewhat amazing, as it seems they do.

>>119352

I have been pondering this next topic for some time and did not intend to "push" it until later if at all, but at this point it is absurd to be coy so I will say that I have personally concluded that Comey is Q.

I realize that some anons viscerally reject the very question and I respect that.

If you think we should "not dox Q" then you are acting from a solid ground, I think.

But my take is that if clues are being provided then we should exploit them in order to humiliate the fake news media.

Now some might agree with me on that, but not be convinced that Comey is Q.

OK, fine.

I am trying to be epistemically forthright.

The evidence that Comey is Q is grounded in the evidence that he is a white hat. (Since Q must be a white hat.)

And that evidence is much stronger, quite naturally I think.

I think that this graphic should go a long way (in a rational justification sense) towards inducing conviction that Comey is actually a white hat.

The alignment of Comey's posts with those of Q, DJT and others is really quite astounding and I am trying to convey that.

As for why I am personally "making the jump" to the conclusion that Comey is Q, here are my reasons:

1) Comey is a very good writer. And a very careful writer who often says things that differ from what the most immediate interpretation is liable to be.

Q is like that also (even if he pretends at times to write poorly). Their "surface styles" may differ considerably, but good writers can write in different "voices".

2) In a "theatrical" sense this just works! Comey has been set up as a chief villain by "our team". At the same time, Hillary never ceases to blame Comey for her loss in 2016. Of course, Hillary also "officially" proclaims that "QAnon" is utter nonsense. But if I am right, then Hillary has been blaiming "Q" all along. And... she is right! Q really DID "screw her"... because Q is part of the patriot team that has worked for years to eliminate traitors.

3) The coordination between the Comey posts and facts and the Q drops is amazing. I fully grant that other "players" work on Q team. I think that insiders monitor Q boards 24-7 and they aren't all James Comey. But when it comes to the key posts and comms, it does seem that there is an extraordinary amount of coordination. Someone has to keep track of this stuff. It isn't all done by having more powerful computers to match numbers, since many comms rely on ideas that a computer cannot extract from the drops. That person keeping track would seem to be Comey.

If you don't like the conclusion that Comey is Q, or think I should not make any hypothesis on that, then please just skip that issue.

I think the evidence that Comey is a white hat is even stronger.

I cannot explain why all these correlations should exist if Comey isn't a white hat.

There are many anons who put out big graphics/Q-maps/etc and some other anons take a look and wonder where to go or what to do with such material.

I respect their work and I have learned from it.

But I will tell you quite forthrightly what my aim is.

I want to convince you in real life that James Comey is a white hat (and is likely Q).

There is actually a fact of the matter about such things.

In reality, James Comey is either a white hat or a black hat or a grey hat (or maybe somehow a no hat, not likely but still).

It is not a matter of my feelings or your feelings.

I have argued that he is a white hat.

I think my conclusion quite literally accords with reality.

So I hope you will test my reasoning for yourself.

If you think I err, try to expose my mistakes.

Maybe I can fix them.

But if you become convinced that I am right, then think on how you can further develop these conclusions and promulgate them.

But by all means think for yourself.

I realize that I am being very "logical" here and some anons prefer to argue with memes and I actually do respect that.

Actually you will see at the very bottom of my graphic I deploy my last "argument" via a meme.

I figured Q said that we need a little humor, so I thought I should comply.

But here this is serious stuff (I do think so) and I am somewhat defaulting to my "training" so to speak and arguing with words.

I have many additional notes regarding Comey and also many additional notes and angles regarding DOJ-related "players" and I plan to continue this dig with new stuff.