Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 10:07 a.m. No.120373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0377 >>0382

>>120359

>>120371

i asked about it and could do it but only if there is nobody else, got enough responsibilities

any of the bakers here would be qualified to take it on with support from other bakers - i would be happy to support

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 10:24 a.m. No.120380   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0383

>>120377

din figure u could but good to talk about this openly

 

i put in a claim at admin@isitwetyet, saying i could take it temporarily

 

problem for me is mostly physical

i have pretty bad tendonitis - as long as things are slow, no problem

but i have claimed other boards for the same reason as /qresearch/ - to protect them - and now have several i am managing also with two major threads on /end/. And doing a lot of digs.

 

Managing /qresearch/ is a big job.

Also, have no wish to have a near monopoly on Q boards.

 

>>120353

Is this BVR or another anon?

Are you interested in BO for /qresearch/?

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 10:30 a.m. No.120387   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0388 >>0389 >>0391

>>120381

In Sept 2020, i contacted nb about starting another board bc of oss on /qresearch/. We talked about the idea of a "council of bakers" running a board but it's really set up for one person, nobody anticipating a board like qresearch. Tom came in later, really wanted to bo - so he did.

 

i try to run qrb pretty sensibly but it's not a group enterprise, mainly coz it's very hard to make group decisions. Most of what i do is based on traditional baker practice and common sense (i hope).

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 10:37 a.m. No.120390   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0392 >>0397

>>120386

tx much friend. not tryin to dox but you were the one who noticed the claim. Probably not a good idea to take on /qresearch/ wo/some kind of BV or BO experience.

 

>>120383

dis doc, correct?

yes, tyvm.

 

>>120385

we have five or six bv's on qrb now.

don't have to have a bv on duty at all times, just enough of the time. they don't even make the effort to cover on /qresearch/, completely hit or miss.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 10:46 a.m. No.120395   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0408

>>120391

council idea more like a philosophy, way of thinking, than an tangible reality

the idea of a cooperative enterprise

bakers already had that, long ago

never had a "bakers council", we all just worked together

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 10:53 a.m. No.120398   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0401 >>0402

>>120389

>qrb low volume and mature citizenry

true. lemme put it this way:

on qrb, problems get immediate attn coz we are here

on qresearch, it takes hours - and sometimes forever - to get breads cleaned up, etc. AND ALWAYS HAS. So even to have BVs who are actually present on the board would be a big deal.

 

>>120388

thanks for weighing in bvr

you already have experience as baker, BV and BO

got questions or concerns?

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 11:33 a.m. No.120411   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0413 >>0415

>>120408

Bakers often asked for anon feedback, espec when adding to Globals or dough

Were careful about making changes, and not done just coz baker felt like it

 

Biggest problem with baking a long time ago was some bakers didn't notable much, anons din like it - that got the kitch into trouble but by 2020, notes were usually pretty good.

 

OSS attacked the board but telling anons that bakers were trying to dominate after KekBee came up with the idea of vetting them (in order to keep gerbil and random shills outta the kitchen). KB's was a good plan but disliked by shills, haha.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 11:45 a.m. No.120417   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0418 >>0422

>>120412

He was always a competent baker but probably a plant from the start. Slit my throat (along with Rusty, Veli and KB) PDQ. When he "apologized" in May 2020, didn't believe. Then came back in July. Bakers gave him another chance - and look what happened. All downhill from there.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, noon No.120421   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0424 >>0425

>>120413

we don't need to council much bc we already had same convos years ago, worked out stuff before.

 

>>120415

i don mean "lean" notes, i mean breads with 5-10 notes for 751 posts (kek). Happened partly coz the priority was having baker on duty if Q posted and sometimes bakers were able to staff but not really to take notes. Later Q kept saying "we are the news," and notes got more developed.

 

Not the same as bloated notables full of weird stuff. We know the difference.

 

Don't personally care what happens with OSS as long as he isn't BV and doesn't spam. However, he should have been banned summer of 2020 for threatening doc and GB (me too indirectly). That is illegal.

 

Would certainly think about restoring /comms/ to ribbon and take a look at oss baker thread, which was created to destroy /comms/. Also would prefer to see last two pages of the dough restored if they are still missing. QR dough is in bad shape.

 

Just thoughts.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 12:27 p.m. No.120427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0428

>>120422

Never did figure out the real story with how 8bit "stepped down" or was "forced out." First sayin fj was a good guy, then later sayin he wasn't, then working with him again....

 

in the 5/29/19 post, who is writing?

One of the anonymous BV's who worked with FJ? FJ would have posted as Board Owner at that time unless he was pretending to be BV. There was at least one nasty BV at that time, he and FJ used to harass me when i baked.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 12:38 p.m. No.120431   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0433

>>120424

>tortilla

ha ha ha. perfect description. as a digger, it's frustrating not to get a good dig notabled. just had to keep reposting.

 

>>120425

of course it was totally made up, it was a total OP.

 

>>120428

Two thing are for sure: stuff doesn't add up and board has been comp'd since April 2019. Amazing it's still going - and why it's worth preserving. Anons are still there working, despite everything.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 12:42 p.m. No.120432   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0439

What i want to know is:

why are 3 of stuck posting in almost the exact same shade of ORANGE?

hard to track....

 

>>120430

you mean, like here?

must be our trusty archivist

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 12:48 p.m. No.120437   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0438

>>120433

yep, day shift was a crapshoot. partly just coz breads were fast, realized that after i started baking. they just missed a lot. when i did days, i tried to get everything. but that's hard, couldn't go more than 2 shifts.

 

nwb was always post everything at night - we were dig partners.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 1:06 p.m. No.120447   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0450 >>0451 >>0457

>>120439

anon told us it was claimable, in hopes someone here would claim it

i put in for a claim but just to secure it

But i think for me it would be "one board too far" - i got too many boards and threads already

 

BVR is offering to run it if nobody else wishes to - tyvm.

He's got another board on 8 and was the baker here on /qrb/ from May 2019 - Mar 2020 after I stepped down.

 

dunno how board came to be claimable

suspected fj might go at some point bc he liked the prestige - not so prestigious now so might be bored?

 

prolly not good to lose your job just to run qr, ha ha ("takin one for da team")

 

>>120388

in case u don't know, aaa is also BV here so he can edit or delete archives. his tripcode is whitelisted on qrb to make it possible to auto archive.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 1:36 p.m. No.120461   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0464

>>120456

so this is bvr, right?

 

i put in a claim to secure /qr/

and sent a note to jim requesting it too

mentioned this discussion about working out the details

let's see who responds and what they say

can u remind me of your board name, plz?

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 1:54 p.m. No.120468   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Got a phone appt with doc (the Kaiser kind) from a window between 2:10 and 2:50. So if i disappear, i'll be back.

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 2:10 p.m. No.120481   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>120477

thought it might be the same guy doing vids of Epstein

was told by qr anons - no, not the same rusty

he was a very good BO, when i became BV on /comms/ told me two things - to check w/him before making deletions and to be kind to anons

Anonymous ID: e87124 Jan. 12, 2022, 2:22 p.m. No.120491   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0494 >>0498

>>120482

>>120487

https://youtu.be/dswaElkiRO8

saw this in MAY 2021

this video is dynamite, notes below.

 

Cassandra Dunn

Registered nurse & certified Federal medical investigator.

 

The covid swab is dipped in carcinogenic, mutagenic ethylene oxide (EO)

Used for sterilization purposes.

 

She looked at 2 dif swabs:

 

  1. ninbo (sp?) - made in China - says "sterile/EO"

 

  1. mariclean technology (sp?) - "sterile/EO"

 

The swab is inserted deep into the nasal cavity, near the brain.

 

So what is EO? ethylene oxide

 

Per US EPA:

  • human CARCINOGEN.

  • exposure via inhalation

  • can can lymphoma & breast cancer, other cancers

  • is also MUTAGENIC

 

Acute inhalation in workers has resulted in all kinds of serious conditions including:

  • nausea, vomiting, neurological disorders and others

  • increased rate of miscarriages, reproductive effects, decreased sperm count.

 

HHS:

EO damages DNA - why it's effective as sterilizer

 

Canadian version of OSHA:

EO is very toxic, causes cancer, changes in genetics & reproduction, genetic defects,

known to cause reduced fertility

 

Some state workers where she lives have to get this test done DAILY, deep into your nasal cavity, close to the brain.

"I don't know what to say, people, this shit's for real, I can't make this up."

 

her website:

purplelionproject.com