Triple-A here
Anyone baking on /qr/?
There seems to be a mistake in the dough.
>>>/qresearch/16229727 #20527 posted in #20529
is mentioned for #20527
That's a notable list.
But that post is also used for this
>>>/qresearch/16229727 P.R. firm reportedly urges major brands to keep quiet about abortion amid Roe v. Wade controversy
Post # seems to be incorrect.
And I think that's pretty important that notable.
Anyone notable algo has been improved. I hope there are no errors in it.
The post for #20529 is incorrect.
"P.R. firm reportedly urges major brands to keep quiet about abortion amid Roe v. Wade controversy" is not found at that post. This means post number is incorrect.
"#20527 posted in #20529" is fine.
Great.
It cuts everything off after Previously Collected.
Even if you don't do that, the harm is not that big.
Found the correct post # for that P.R. firm
remove /qresearch/ prefix
Talking about
>>16229727 P.R. firm reportedly urges major brands to keep quiet about abortion amid Roe v. Wade controversy
as well. Moment editing. Have to be quick for scraper.
fixed both errors
and a note, that post of mine about 2000 mules mega bun, I can probably even implement a solution around that problem.
Thing is if that anon reposts that mega bun, and baker links to it - it will get parsed through and the name the baker gave it will get used for the notable names.
So for example baker calls it "2000 mules mega mega bun" and the bun itself has links called "Trump announced that 2000 Mules will be screened at the rally on Friday"
Then what is going to happen is that the scraper will add both texts together and the result is going to be:
"2000 mules mega mega bun / Trump announced that 2000 Mules will be screened at the rally on Friday"
Now next baker comes and links against updated mega bun again, this time calling it "2000 mules mega mega super bun".
Then that will change all the notable descriptions, and thus will trigger updates.
See here for the regular updates:
But I think I should be able to circumvent that problem and then it will be irrelevant what the baker calls it.
Just implemented something, I hope it works.
I saw that this anon reposted an updated mega bun, so hopefully there won't be 10+ updates caused by it.
>Providing counter-narratives is unlikely to work for similar reasons as to why the US' Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) 2013 'Think Again, Turn Away' campaign failed: source credibility.
top kek
>Think again
No no no, the objective is to stop thinking and do what main stream media says.
But yeah, flooding it with plausible bots may actually work. I have not seen these. There is at least 1 human spamming threads with Hitler shit, always the same pics though, so also not credible. Or that other bot with the "inbred" crap, which also doesn't work.
The problem these fucks have is that they are too lazy to come up with new content. They spam the same crap over and over again, which makes it obvious to anyone that it's not authentic.
It's also telling when they have to hire shills to post "muh Hitler gud boi" nonsense and that wouldn't exist without them, but then speak of "extreme content".
>Brenton Tarrant's attack
In my opinion fake + ghey, I may be wrong on that, but to me it seems like another fake mass shooting.
>their manifestors
Yeah right. Let's even pretend there are 5 people on chans that actually do that kind of stuff. So what? 5 people on facebook are probably mass murderers. No one would even think about shutting down facebook because of that.