Nasdaq, NYSE Dealt Blow in Clash With SEC Over Market-Data Feeds
Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange were dealt a blow in their bids to block the Securities and Exchange Commission from implementing new rules for stock-trading data.
A decision by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday not to review regulations the SEC passed in December 2020 allows the agency to move ahead with a push to make trading data more readily available. The changes could negatively impact exchange operators’ lucrative market-data businesses. The SEC and Nasdaq declined to comment. NYSE didn’t respond to a request. The court ruling is the latest twist in the years-long battle over exchanges’ data streams, which include information on market dynamics and certain types of transactions. The SEC unanimously passed the new regulations to push more of that information into so-called public data feeds, which are lower cost and more standardized. Stock exchange operators opposing the rules have argued they will result in greater information asymmetries and make the market more prone to disruptions. Meanwhile, the overhaul, which was a key part of the SEC’s effort to crack down on stock-market data during the Trump administration, has support from brokerages that say the platforms too much power over the information streams that are a lifeblood of modern trading.
The court’s decision may mean that “new players can enter the market, create competition, and potentially the price of market data will go down,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb said. “But prices could also go up, given there is nothing about what price the exchanges have to sell the data for,” he said. The regulation could reduce exchanges’ net data revenue by 8%, according to Bloomberg Intelligence calculations. Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, is among firms that in the past have contested exchanges’ fee increases for private data feeds.
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/nasdaq-nyse-dealt-blow-in-clash-with-sec-over-market-data-feeds-1.1770528
They get paid to provide orders in the current system by kickbacks from the market makers so this "appears" to be dealing with thisBUTit is Gary Gensler (SEC and former CFTC Chairman and CFO for Hillary 2016 who authorized ALL the payments for all that shit you know all about) and until they disincentivize the whole fuggen thing (Spoofing etc) by charging them to place ALL orders so they can't pull them at the last minute-what that does it trick others into thinking there is moar book depth in whatever it is they are doing it in-they can obviously get around whatever regs they come up with to make it look like the data-feeds are moar "public"-if they are still spoofing does it really matter if it is "public" or not? methinks not.