Food plan for England condemned by its own lead adviser
(First thing you will notice is this ‘adviser’ is a soyboy SJW with a language all his owm. But wait, there are more...)
(PART 1)
Henry Dimbleby says government’s response to his review of food system shows no vision and ‘is not a strategy’
Helena Horton and Peter Walker
Sun 12 Jun 2022 19.01 EDT
Last modified on Mon 13 Jun 2022 00.12 EDT
The government’s LEAD ADVISOR on food issues has condemned what ministers have billed as a landmark national plan to combat food poverty and obesity, saying it is “not a strategy” and warning it could mean more children will go hungry.
Henry Dimbleby’s verdict is further bad news for Boris Johnson as the white paper is a direct response to last year’s wide-ranging review of Britain’s food system, which was led by THE RESTAURATEUR.
Johnson’s plan was billed as the first such blueprint SINCE RATIONING 75 YEARS AGO, (and they brag about that) positioning England as a leader on food and environment in a post-Brexit world. But the final plan strips away many of Dimbleby’s key recommendations.
“It’s not a strategy,” the founder of the Leon food chain said of the final document, which he has been shown. “It doesn’t set out a clear vision as to why we have the problems we have now and it doesn’t set out what needs to be done.”
The document, to be introduced into the House of Commons by the environment secretary, George Eustice, on Monday, is virtually unchanged from a leaked draft revealed by the Guardian last week.
In his document, Dimbleby made a number of high-profile suggestions, including a significant expansion to free school meals, greater environment and welfare standards in farming, and a 30% REDUCTION IN MEAT AND DAIRY CONSUMPTION.
‘Worse than half-baked’: Johnson’s food strategy fails to tackle cost or climate. (Spoken by the fully-baked restaurant owner.)
Instead, the few specific policies chosen by the government include an increase in domestic tomato production, and making it easier for deer stalkers to sell wild venison.
Dimbleby said the cost of living crisis meant there was even more need for free school meals than when he produced his plan, which called for up to 1.5 million more children in England to receive them.
“With inflation as it is, both the amount spent on FREE SCHOOL MEALS is significantly less in real terms than it was a year ago and the number of people who need it is significantly more – we need to tackle that,” Dimbleby said. (He thinks they don’t account for increases in costs yeat to year? And how many students they need meals for?)
“I do hope it is being looked at, people are being inflated into poverty and food providers are being inflated into not producing healthy meals,” he warned.
He was also critical of one thing that did change between the draft seen by the Guardian and the final version, involving the removal of commitments to make it easier to import FOOD WITH HIGH ANIMAL WELFARE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS.
He said: “Yet again the government has ducked the issue of how we don’t just import FOOD THAT DESTROYS THE ENVIRONMENT and [which] is cruel to animals – we can’t CREATE A GOOD FAIR FARMING SYSTEN- then export those harms abroad. I thought the government would address this but it didn’t.”
(End part 1)