Anonymous ID: 1c6163 July 18, 2019, 5:40 a.m. No.18050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8054 >>8079

>>17678

yeah you Bakers are the ones I empythise with the most over what happened on qr. And such a great tag team too, covering each other. I did try to always thank you guys cause Im a sensitive soul !

 

Can I ask what you mean by picking off the bakers? You mean the BV's were baking and wouldnt hand over? Or just letting shill bakers bake?

Anonymous ID: 1c6163 July 18, 2019, 6:26 a.m. No.18136   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18079

He did!

 

Thanks for your answer...I tried to keep away from all the drama, and sort of missed the fact that Bakers were no longer needed. What a kick in the teeth for Bakers.

Anonymous ID: 1c6163 July 18, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.18151   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8155 >>8157 >>8229 >>8303 >>8338

>>18000

https://spectator.us/ilhan-omar-lawyer-marriages/

 

‘I’m not legally married to two people, but I am legally married to one and culturally married to another.’ That’s how Ilhan Omar’s campaign spokesman Ben Goldfarb summarized Omar’s conjugal arrangements in an email in August 2016, when Omar was running for Congress and her advisers were trying to stifle allegations of double marriage — with a man alleged to be her brother.

 

Omar supplied this email to the Minnesota Campaign and Public Disclosure Board’s investigation into her campaign financing. That investigation concluded on June 6 by ordering Omar to refund $3,500 in misused campaign funds, and to pay a $500 fine. It also revealed that in 2014 and 2015, Omar may have broken federal and state law by filing a joint tax return with her husband Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi — when she was married to another man.

When conservative journalists in Minnesota raised the bigamy allegations in 2016, Omar issued a statement calling the allegations ‘baseless, absurd rumors’ and issued a statement accusing the journalists of ‘Islamophobia’. Her statement was taken verbatim from Goldfarb’s email. That same email appears to admit that the allegations are not without basis. Goldfarb describes how he tried to construct a denial based on ‘real background information’, but found it ‘impossible’:

‘…we are probably in a position where giving real background information is helpful in tying this up. That said, having no tried to write a statement multiple times that says, “I’m not legally married to two people but I am legally married to one and culturally married to another”, I think it’s impossible without making it even more confusing.’

 

 

Have a look at this if you can...maybe youve seen it,