>>17756

>>17757

What a glorious morning, faggots.

I reluctantly went to sleep during the Qbaby thread after 36+ hours on call (to here, obviously) and had to get up 3 1/2 hours later only to find the Qbaby bread still active and that slackjack/farbox had just been BTFO by Q.

I don't know if I can handle any more winning, just kidding, of course I can.

Love you all, faggots (no homo).

As for staying here in comfy, my only question is "Is it fair to 8bit, who only opened this bunker reluctantly due ti IRL and is handling all the admin on his lonesome?"

As for me, I, like many true anons, do not want to return to QR irrespective of whether slackjack/fartbox has bowed down to Q's wishes or not, he is still a giant faggot.

>>17745

>That said, I think there should be no ill will at all between the two.

That's right!

We should just forget that slackjack/farbox is a comped piece of shit faggot and let bygones be bygones and not concern ourselves that he still holds the keys.

>>17804

>It's not annoying. Shitpost there, research here.

One thing I am still unsure of after slackjack/fartbox got BTFO by Q and told to revert back to original format, is if real bakers are allowed back in the kitchen.

Not that that will change my opinion of QR under his, ahem, leadership.

>>17827

>"Q didn't specifically saaaay..."

That though certainly crossed my mind.

>>17841

>1500 bce

This is part of the oft used tactic of manipulation through spelling; what's wrong with BC?

I am not a Christian, but appreciate it's relevancy and do not appreciate the phonetic gymnastics used to manipulate and control thought.

>>17885

>How is BC any different?

As I said, I am not a Christian, and the whole BC thing does not only focus on the death of Christ (I am not even certain that Christ was an actual living, breathing individual), but fucking with dating nomenclature is an attempt to destroy the relevancy of Christianity,whilst pushing the Muslimification of the World.

>>17853

You gonna luv dis guy.

>>17856

Sage words, anon.

>>17940

>You’ve never seen writings of Tacitus?

I confess that I have not read Tacitus, and am slightly familiar with his work.

I should, at some point, read what he actually wrote, it's just that it doesn't have highest priority for me at this juncture of time.

>>17943

What's even funnier, I abhor txtspeak/spelling and unintentional misuse of the language:

loose/lose

than/then

Could of, should of, would of etc,

Etc, etc.

>>17956

Lurk moar, faggot, and read notables at the top of the bread where they belong, be it here or at QR

.

>>17936

>SENATE WAS THE KEY."

And that's why Anons trusted the plan without concernfagging.

Pelosi and Co were given the House so they could author their own destruction (with a little additional prompting from POTUS, I would wager).

>>17985

>still doubt in your mind as to the historical person of Jesus if Nazareth.

Anon, there is doubt in my mind about everything I've been told is fact, but I do try and maintain an open mind and mentally collate available information to come to a position in which I feel comfortable, but flexible enough to modify which way I lean as further information comes my way.

Perhaps Tacitus could provide the impetus in respect to Jesus.