Anonymous ID: c4cbc6 July 18, 2019, 1:09 a.m. No.17673   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7738

Baker, the bread title format has changed again like it did yesterday. The original format is: QRB General #XX: ...

It's probably best to be consistent and my scraper depends on it.

Anonymous ID: c4cbc6 July 18, 2019, 1:47 a.m. No.17717   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7731 >>7745 >>7758

>>17689

>Honestly, I’m not entirely convinced of why 2 is not moar better than one in this situation.

 

Fully agree, even apart from the recent drama over at QR.

 

I have mixed feelings about Q's intervention. Why wait several days? He firmly corrected FJ, but then supported him personally.

 

Best interpretation is that Q wanted a splinter cell to become solidly established before he intervened, and Q ''wants" QR to be a shill corral to protect QRB. Supporting FJ might be a subtle message to anons. QR = SCV = Shill Containment Vehicle.

Anonymous ID: c4cbc6 July 18, 2019, 2:35 a.m. No.17779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7784

>>17745

 

>That said, I think there should be no ill will at all between the two.

 

In fact, it would be in our best interest to lend some legitimacy to QR by being supportive and contributing research there.

Anonymous ID: c4cbc6 July 18, 2019, 2:47 a.m. No.17800   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17784

>It was a straight up power grab and the fact that q had to even intervene means the asshole is not to be trusted.

 

Agreed, but maybe Q finds FJ to be useful as manager of a shill corral, which will have the effect of shielding QRB. But without our support, QR may eventually implode under FJ's misdirection. Besides, our supportive presence in QR would be good PR for us and could quietly attract new recruits.