Anonymous ID: f55551 July 18, 2019, 11:08 a.m. No.18598   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8658

>>17936 /lb

Just so I understand you...You had to add a bit of your own bias into what Trey Gowdy said, I get that, but why the continuing of the problem with your: "QResearch = House QRB = Senate" comment?

 

The greatest problem with the way "governments" are set up in what is supposedly any democratic system create a major problem that just doesn't seem to get addressed: two groups with disparate ideas run for power and control; one side loses and their ideas are rejected by a majority; but that side then fights the winning side as the "opposition" and thus seemingly compelled to "oppose" or be branded with some childish whine about supporting the "other side." Actually, they are just pissed that they lost what they were having organsmic night dreams about: total control to force their emotionally-attached-to opinions on to others. So the "opposition" fights against the winning and thus "ruling" side and does nothing else...but still gets paid to continue to try and force their already-rejected-by-the-electorate "ideas?" on those not wanting those "ideas?" while blocking any positive attempts to improve a deteriorating situation.

 

Government is one word and based on the word Govern which essentially means "look after the people."

 

For myself, the "government" of the board(s) are those who run the boards. We, those who lurk and maybe sometimes mouth off on our own predelictions, have nothing to do with the "government" of the board in the sense that acting as if this or any other "chan" board somehow belongs to those who just show up once in a while to vent; it doesn't.

 

Sowing division always creates division. Advocating superiority of one over an other creates division. Not understanding human nature creates division. Not being willing to look at mistakes made for WHATEVER friggin' reason and then allowing those mistakes to be corrected and moving forward...creates division.

 

Just being pompous, but isn't the goal Q Research? Does it matter whether I click on one link or another to come and learn? Is one better than another? Did you think for very long before you decided to associate QResearch with what is now in modern society and especially in relation to those visiting, a failed, wacko, degenerate, anti-American, anti-Israel collection of sub-intellects...while at the same time deciding that it should be QRB that should be associated with the aspect of American governance that has ultimate power to ignore what the "House" does as they have veto power?

 

Of course, when one decides to use such a comparison and there are only two options one is placed between not just a rock and a hard place but between a magnetic rock and a large magnet.

 

We now have something we didn't have last week: two places we can visit, learn and participate: Winning!

Anonymous ID: f55551 July 18, 2019, 2:26 p.m. No.18936   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18600

I used to get so annoyed when there was only one "board" but I didn't realize until we had two functioning (now) boards. When there was only QResearch it was often difficult to get through the jew/anti-jew, semite/anti-semite, shill/shill-writing-to-themselves detritus.

 

The intelligence of the majority of visitors adding to and commenting on Q and the true "SOTU" is often on display but due the paid disruptors often driven down and off the "front" page in - sometimes - minutes.

 

Now, a more leisurely perusal of the writings of intelligent, thoughtful, rational, logical real humans is possible rather than a bit of panic when you realize you're reading a bread that's two full pages behind where the action is taking place and a hunt through "JUST" the notables to see what you've missed results in...missing other gems because of the rush. Crap is and will continue to creep in, of course, as pay is important for work being done and if they aren't doing their job to try and destroy the community they don't get paid, but it is much easier, so far, to ignore them.

 

Feeling very relaxed now. Read here for awhile, read "over there" for awhile, pour some tea and lo and behold I'm still able to return to "both" breads and be current.

 

Thanks Q for "negotiating" to solve the problem including correcting rather than using a cat-o-nine-tails. Any specific books you read, Q, that helped you in negotiating?