Morning Anons.

So The Case Law pdf. I let loose yesterday?

One anon said there was a complaint about genetically modified solders in Syria?

Needed sauce.

Found an article (Wish I did not) about the Syrian Ambassador complaining about the "genetically modified terrorists".

Was hoping there was no sauce for that.

Unfortunately there is. So, I have to prep the article for upload now.

Anyway, would not have believed it if I did not see it myself. Might as well upload the 60 second clip of the Syrian Ambassador for all here while I work on figuring some way to create a post that can explain how this can be done these days using genetic splicing.

(a process of cutting the DNA, inserting a code from another life form, then closeing the DNA so the life form starts expressing that inserted gene. They use it to make insulin, have been for a long time)

I am assuming for the moment that they are using embryos, and not able to alter adult DNA. Hope to not find any surprises here.... ever.

Anons who know how to download youtube? I have tried a number of ways, and still can not download youtubes to archive them since they got rid of keepvid. I think my rural internet is incapable. So, could you all do me the favor of archiving this one for me off line? I will keep trying any site I can find that might work too.

Thanks.

Blessings on anons today.

>>20051

Your biotech relative would know a LOT more than this lowly simple bioanon, because biotech is where this is actually done.

I only have rudimentary theoretical understanding of how it COULD work, and simple examples from 20 years ago when we looked at insulin production in college.

No hands on experience.

Would love to hear more comments from your relative as I look at this. I'm 20 years behind on the science.

Can you ask him/her what is the difference between the CRISPER tech and regular original splicing? Adjacent base pairs sounds like they are attaching whole DNA strands off to the side of the original strand. Just base pairs off to the side but not the whole backbone?

I am going to head out and look for a good pic of this process if I can find one.

From what you say here, and what I am reading elsewhere, am I correct in thinking Crisper is an addition of a third strand or part outside the double helix, while splicing keeps a double helix in tact, but, adds code between a start and stop command code of some sort?

Let me know what your biotech relative has to say if he she would like to help this anon info-graphic this process in a simple way for normies. Just need a good update location with some pics that are able to simplify the general picture.

And tell relative biotech anon thanks for the input. It is much appreciated.

>>20122

Anon, no questions, just a huge huge thank you.

>Crispr unintended effects in human genomic DNA were predictable ... weirdly imprecise results in lab experiments ... never got it to work the way it was supposed to...

>colleagues discarded uncomfortable results, published only their successful-looking experiments while suppressing any weird contradictory data ...

I am posting what is probably one of the "successful looking experiments" here that you speak of, but only to help non science anons get a grip on this as I try to put it together for the first time myself.

I made a series of graphics down the side to show what I was taught our science was able to do 40 years ago (1983) for people who needed insulin. It was a simple process, but I imagine there was a hunt through organisms with the right "sticky sequence" to slice, in order to match the Human DNA cut ends so the puzzle would snap together in the insulin production bacteria.

Not hard for normies to "get it" by looking at the pictures. Just a tiny puzzle. Back then you had to make sure the Human DNA ends matched and snapped in like a puzzle piece with the bacteria DNA ends, but if you could find that matching piece cutter, you could insert human DNA into bacteria, and make the bacteria run off a new human gene every time it divided into new bacteria.

Wallaaah! Lots of human insulin, save many lives!

Not a hard thing to get.

But with CRISPER, they have taken the bacteria defense against VIRUS DNA, and learned that they can program it to cut ANYWHERE on the DNA strand.

Programmable snippers.

Wow.

And YES that would let (((them))) wreak havoc on the population if they then find a way to insert these into even grown humans I would think. Not quite sure down that rabbit hole, need more info.

Wondering if there is a danger that CRISPER thing could get loose. Maybe this is why the article I am working on, and the CASE pdf talked about the example of sending out a bioweapon that would attack only people with blue eyes?

Here is for anons to look at. I have attempted to describe CRISPER in lay terms as much as possible, with pictures to simplify things.

>>20242

Here is an edit corrected copy of that article. Was not watching close enough. Got letters run together.

>>20249

Weirdness today. Glad the new glasses are on order. This is the wrong pic, but, it is helpful for anons catching up. These are snippets from the Case pdf released yesterday on the Legal rights and other legal questions about transhuman hybrid soldiers.

Will attempt another corrected repost up top in OP.

Need better glasses. Old fag. Sorry.

>>20242

Trying that infographic post again, without the letters run together so easier to read.