>>21274 PB Q post? (Suspected Homework Assignment from anon)
>>>9037 (You)
What is this. Homework? Kek. Ok I'll bite.
Love and blessings to you
Nice post.
>What is required for MI to take over all other agencies?
A little insurrection? Mebbe some governors/mayors refusing to put the right kiddies on the right buses?
A few treasonous Mayers letting enemies into the country, giving shelter to them in some sanctuary cities might do nicely. Want the legal citation? Gimme my Qresearch library. What's better than that? A real LAW library. I know, I ask too much :)
>What was the purpose of the arrival of Q so far out?
Q is a psyop on the population and possibly a way to use anons as camouflage for message recipients. Setting the stage for prevention of panic. Teaching comms, proving Q capacity/intent. Psyop has bad connotations that should be ignored here. If you can wreck a population mentally in war with psyop, logic follows you can repair the population thinking/understanding also. Brilliant idea, actually.
It helps when people paying attention can take action to help /our guys/.
>Game theory.
Not schooled in that enough to talk about it. Could use a good book on it tho.
>What is good design?
Depends on your objective, but if you are referencing that post I made, QR, with good BO who understands Constitutional law as shill flypaper, QRB research site for peaceful digging, and a searchable library of Notables would be good start?
Was thinking bout library this morning.
1) there is a way to search the site now, I am sure, but, method is not obvious, and should be.
2) Everything archived here is critical information mass. Does not need organized so much as a simple site crawler for search terms mebbe? And mebbe a simple off page search engine?
Might be good to make a new QR tradition here of having people ponder and place keywords with their Notable research, for easier indexing and relocation?
>Always kill as many birds with each stone?
Yes, if you can. Of course.
>Was the enemy continually wrong footed?
In what sense. Planning wise for Plan A, no. They had the money, time, and blackmailed resources so well locked in, if not for our military re-taking the white house in the election, huge numbers of us would be dead right now.
Where they failed is they were so sure of their footing they never made a plan "B", and scrambling to do it is a big problem now - got caught, with a lethal Constitution completely in tact, running up against some great military insiders. Cant thank /our guys/ enough.
>How much of their arsenal have they spent?
Nearly all, in the only place that matters now. "Optics". (At least we can hope this is the case)
Have no clue what other real weapons they may still have.
>Who leaked the UK ambassador's comms?
>>7038554
Got this from the search engine I just found.
https://qresear.ch
The Mail? As in Daily Mail?
This is a nice library start, just not obvious where to find it, how to use it yet. This thing should be front and center with instructions for newbies, guys. VERY VALUABLE.
>Who really leaked it?
Someone in 10 Downing street who was present most likely, unless the place is bugged.
>>7044800
"the suspected leaker has reportedly been identified, and a foreign state has been ruled out as the culprit."
Could have been someone at the Embassy too.
>Does it replay the desired shaped narrative of the enemy?
Unsuccessfully. Yeah. But they have to try, right?
>Does it try to validate Chris Steele as solid in his gathering of Intel?
Yes, but Steele admits it was trash early on so, too late to resurrect their "plan".
>Why is this important?
Important to who? They need to resurrect this idea that Trump is a Russian puppet if they can.
1/2