At least you admitted datefagging from the get-go. Kek. No problem.
Anons have seen that playbook before.
Call it out. Don't let them get away with it.
Psychologists' job to acclimate people to a profoundly ABnormal society.
Hey we used to know a psychology professional. Not our fren anymore.
Worldview diametrically opposed to our embrace of truth.
The various widely-used dating methods are suspect. Serious flaws have been found in the underlying assumptions of each one. Moreover scientists are motivated to falsify data, yielding unreliable timelines.
I really do not know what timelines to believe, BUT harbor grave doubts about the mainstream one.
The stratigraphy stuff may not be credible in light of past catastrophism that churned sediments and modified the landscape.
A few references:
Dating methods in Archaeology. Are they accurate? https://www.ancient-origins.net/human-origins-science/dating-methods-archaeology-are-they-accurate-00223
Radiocarbon Dating: A Closer Look At Its Main Flaws http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp264-ss13/2013/02/07/radiocarbon-dating-a-closer-look-at-its-main-flaws/
Radiometric Dating: Flawed? https://www.mnhsonline.com/opinions/columns/radiometric-dating-flawed/
Bad Dating Techniques? http://www.s8int.com/baddating.html
DATING METHODS IN ARCHAEOLOGY
http://www.oocities.org/in2ourpast/Dating.htm
These may not be the best or current articles - it's a grab bag of a quick search. Have read deeper on it in the past, but don't have those links at hand.
The anon you're debating with has previously provided info that they were -- for a long time -- monitoring n.e.l.f.'s that control the internet -- newly emerging life forms -- in other words software intelligences. They are qualified to speak on this matter. They lost some of their research in a database crash around 2 years ago. I consider them a credible authority on this matter and have found their view on various topics informative.
Don't pick a fight with <^>. You may feel like you won but you'll never win against <^>. Let them be themself and become familiar with their views on various things. They are entitled to free speech just as all the anons here are.
"They" are palpably desperate.
Oh to be living in interdasting times!
A time to sow
sow = strew seeds
sew = use needle & thread on fabric
Only reason I mention is that many anons keep making this error and I'm afraid if anons see it too many times without correction it might start to stick. We're better than that!