>>24508 (LB)
Worth a look, anons. Has mil visited Epstein Island and posted some video evidence of it? Anons have asked for that lately.
Wondering if this was a response...
directly to this board?
I think you miss my point. That doesn't look like USGI equipment, and I don't think that was the implication.
The implication is that it's JE's attempt to put some commercial-grade security systems on the island, and it looks like some mil professionals worked those systems over during a romp on his lands...
So it appears at this juncture. Bluff? Guile? Mean it? IDK.
But the court still doesn't understand the word "phoot". Kek!
One thing that's always bothered me about the intelligence stars wall at the CIA is that it says "who gave their lives in the service of their country."
Not "who gave their lives in service TO their country" or "FOR their country."
"in THE service OF their country."
Can be read at least 2 ways...one good, the other - not so much.
>>24508 lb
Baker Notable
Analysis of possible UGS (in-ground security sensors) on Epstein Island that may have been ransacked by mil personnel.
This was posted in the heel of lb so it didn't attract much attention. Anon mentions it might be proof from Rusty that mil visited LSJ
In defense of Planefags, they have their hands full watching day-to-day flight ops.
Missong this one's on the dig team, but ir surely isn't the first time.
No shame in that. Q team has some very smooth moves imho.
Let's get to it, team. Theis is an all-hands evolution, to borrow a phrase from my Navy days.
Not as far a jump as it appears. No sauce but if you read the full thread from lb and the top of this one, anons discussed multiple calls for a visit to the island by milpers. The quality of the videos are obviously pretty high, invasive and don't appear flight-limited to civilian restraints (some shots look in excess of 400 ft).
So, who does that? Why the boxes very recently? Seems like a response.
I think it's notable. You're welcome to disagree.
Sauce is the vids themselves and a pretty good analysis of what's shown in the photos.
Maybe you just leave electrical shit laying around exposed to the weather. Most people with a lick of common sense do not. Sounds pretty plausible to me.
And I'm willing to bet you don't leave exposed electrical/electronic items open and exposed, either, so i apologize for the snide remark.
Another point to consider - what are those things, anyway? It's not likely he's gonna put up an island phone system and i didn't see coax (video) cabling...
Nope. That's a UGS security system. Only thing that makes sense.
Ok, lemme put this all the way on the table
Still say BAKER NOTABLE
Possible US Mil incursion onto LSJ, proof in video from Rusty
-
"Rusty" has been dropping vids of LSJ, and now today BSJ, for some time.
-
The videos are very well done, by an experienced operator. The camera quality is good, very little is known about Rusty (and I'm not encouraging a dox). The video stabilization, along with optical quality, and closeness of some videos, as well as the duration of flight, speak to someone with a minimum of advanced commercial-grade tech at least, and absolutely no fear of being caught. It's not like this has been hidden from the bad guys.
-
Some of the apparent flight altitudes based on the camera aspects indicate that the 400 foot civilian drone ceiling is of no concern to this operator. Who would operate without such restrictions? And who would continue to operate in this area with such impunity when the operations are plainly known (on YouTube, no less) to the opposition?
-
Anons (me and some others) have opined/asked/begged for at least a couple of days now for indications that a military foray onto LSJ has happened.
-
Rusty's last LSJ video included several video shots of ground-based electronics on the island. Pics with analysis are included in >>24508 (LB) and re-posted here for ease of reference.
-
Why those shots, when other structures are of far more interest to anons?
-
More to the point, what are those boxes?
-
Analysis of those boxes (and from what I can see) does NOT show fiberoptic links/cabling which is distinctive, so fiberoptic comms are out. I don't see fiberoptic connectors anywhere. More to the point, I don't see coax video cables anywhere.
-
Since it doesn't stand to reason that the island would be wired in the hinterlands for inter- or intra-island telephone, they don't look like comms OR video boxes at all. So what are they?
-
One of the photos faintly shows a round object inside the box (the one in the ground) which speaks to a likely UGS (unmanned ground sensor), a type of security system designed to capture seismic (ground movement) activity. Another suggests a type of probe near a box.
-
The boxes are left open. WHO FREAKING DOES THAT WITH ELECTRONICS OUT IN THE OPEN?!
-
The cabling in both points to both power cables (white/black) and signals cables (yellow, probably multi-conductor strands inside of a yellow sheathing. So, it's probable that these systems, whatever they are, deal with both power AND signals.
-
So, what purposes would they have? Perspiring minds would like to know, but prolly already have a good answer....
-
Again, WHO LEAVES THESE BOXES OPEN TO THE WEATHER?
-
As the anon with the analysis notes, these boxes look like they have been opened up and no one cared to put them back together. WHO WOULD DO THAT? (If you're sensing an eye roll here, you're spot on.) Leaving these boxes open, particularly one that is in the ground where water will collect, makes about as much sense as a three-handled hammer.
-
Rusty posted this about a day or two AFTER anons started give voice to the "can we send some SEALS to that place" wishfulness.
-
Conclusion - THESE SHOTS FROM THIS VIDEO GIVE EVIDENCE THAT SOME GOOD GUYS VISITED LSJ.
THAT
makes this a damn Notable. IMHO.
Have at it, anons. Show me how this is wrong. Please.
Do you leave ethernet cabling out in the weather? Or external boxes open, especially one that's in the ground?
And what's that round item in the bottom of the ground box? Cover is reversed, too. Beveled edges facing the opposite direction and completely open.
Last but not least, what about the power cabling (white/black conduits) in both? Haven't seen ethernet use those.
Nope. I think it's something else. And there aren't many (i.e. really any) alternatives, are there?
It's ok, anon. In a few weeks you'll be a pro at maintaining a low profile. Give it a little longer and you'll be solid at throwing out subtle redpills.
It develops. Enjoy the ride. Don't fret, your teammates are here for you. Blessings, fren.
>And what's that round item in the bottom of the ground box?
A coil of wire called a service loop.
< We're not looking at the same thing. A service loop of wire is WIRE. The black, round object sitting in the middle of the in-ground box (Epstain Box #2 pic) is very faint, but it is a solid object. It's not wires in a service loop. Look again, more closely this time
>Cover is reversed, too.
No, it isn't
<Yeah, it is. The beveled edges (referring to the corners that do not have square edges) on the lid face in the opposite direction of those in the in-ground box, in Epstain Box #2 pic.
>Beveled edges facing the opposite direction and completely open.
No, the flats on the outer rim line up perfectly with the in-ground box. See my first response.
<See my response to your 2nd point above.
>what about the power cabling (white/black conduits) in both?
I see four wires, two black and two white. Hot/Neutral for two circuits. Too thick for signal wire. About 12-14GA it appears. Perfectly logical.
<Look more closely at Epstain Box #2 pic. You don't see a yellow and possibly orange conductor at the tip of the 2nd red arrow in the photo? Those are there...and they ARE NOT power cables. They are signals cables.
Pic related. See 2nd arrow from top. Three visible conduits and likely a black fourth one below based on the cable run. One conduit at the arrow tip is obviously white, one is definitely yellow, third is either orange or red.
And the box in the lower corner is not squared, it has an angle in the corner. That's the beveled edge. The lid faces the opposite of the beveled edge.
Now 45 posts as of this reply.
I looked at some of 'em. Maybe you aren't, but you are being pretty insufferable. The replies to my posts have all been about substantive issues, and I've rebutted them.
Or maybe you just don't like what was posted in >>25037?
Pay attention, anon. It's very likely that some mil operators have been speaking to this board and few are listening. I've begged anyone here to refute the analysis, and imo it's pretty cogent. But WTH would I know, I can't claim that I've ever worked in intel (lmao).
<The lid appears to be flipped over, as if on a hinge.
>Dear God, do I have to do this with everyone? SHOW ME THE HINGE. HINT - THERE ISN'T ONE.
> A conduit is a tubular structure used to carry wires, not the wires themselves.
<Conduit is routinely referred to in electronics as any bundled set of conductors wrapped in an outer insulator, anon. Worked with high-grade mil electronics for some time.
>It is common in electrical installations to have different colored hot wires, with white being neutral according to standard. Black is usually hot for circuit 1, red for circuit 2.
<In 220 volt systems with more than one hot leg, yes. Show me a 220v circuit for electronics, though - I dare you. HINT...THERE AREN'T ANY, THEY'RE ALL LOW VOLTAGE REQUIRING ONLY 110 V STEPPED DOWN TO 5V (TYPICALLY).
>It s not uncommon to have more than one hot wire per neutral.
< See previous.
>What you seem to be calling yellow appears brown to this anon. Either way, both are common color codes to help identify circuits. Look at wire on homedepot.com or something.
<Thanks for your input. Get new glasses. Yellow conduit is plainly apparent.
>The round, what you call object, in the bottom appears to be a hole in the base looking into the dirt to this anon. If it were an inductive coil, it would use smaller wire with more turns to increase sensitivity and, in any case, would need to be overran directly above the box in the given orientation.
<See >>25184 and that isn't a hole
>In ANY case, I see no electronics to condition/process/relay ANY signals so, what's your point?
<If your incorrect statements haven't been thoroughly debunked yet, I guess I don't have one.
But obviously I do
You're a soup sandwich. GTFOH with your slide BS.
Reterminate an SLQ-48(V) tether. Did it 30 years ago, yes the kevlar braid sheath and the interior insulated twisted-pair cables are CONDUITS.
Concrete? Yeah, ok, so that's your take. Changing your tune now.
110 to 5VDC? Really? You cited homedepot as your source for color-coding, dibstick, I figured you didn't have enough sense to know the difference between step-down transformers and rectifying transformers.
And NO, it's not common to have multiple hots sharing a neutral for data. Dibstick. This isn't house code, this is commercial UGS. Low voltage data outputs from standard 110 VAC stepped-down regulated inputs.
Your a dumbass. Go back to working on house transformers.
Happens when you're committed to getting out good info. We're never too old to learn, or make the same old mistakes, bro.
Take a look at your posts, Langley Faggitron, if you wanna see a glow.