Anonymous ID: 302da6 July 24, 2019, 9:11 p.m. No.27737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7746 >>7866

>>27650 >>27659

i hadn't seen mueller in action before and after reading your remarks i went looking for earlier vid of him. found an interview from 2018. check out the difference.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lmpz6D1cPCA

(interview with aaron harber)

Anonymous ID: 302da6 July 24, 2019, 9:25 p.m. No.27763   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7767

>>27746

for sure POTUS owns him

for months now i've been sitting back enjoying the movie, watching Q and Q+ move all the pieces around the board

i still worry about operators in harm's way during ops but mostly just keep reminding myself that mostly this is just optics

as anons say, God wins

Anonymous ID: 302da6 July 25, 2019, 11:04 a.m. No.28156   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>27851

 

took me a minute to figure out why december 2041 was niggling at my brain.

'cause december 1941 was attack on pearl harbor.

just sayin'....

Anonymous ID: 302da6 July 25, 2019, 11:38 a.m. No.28182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8299

anons, i would like to share this passage from "the invisible war" by donald barnhouse. just read it this morning and seems to me to describe the operation against the deep state perfectly:

 

"...God did not seize the authority and offices which he had given Satan, when the rebellion first came to light. He could have done so, of course, for omnipotence is infinitely beyond any degree of finite power. God was waiting for the cross in order to begin the work of disarming Satan. The process might seem slow to men, living within the ticking moments of time, but in the sight of the eternal God and the spirit-beings who are beyond time, the process was inexorable and certain. From the moment Christ died, the watching universe would see that Satan and his hosts were sentenced and that the present and future manifestations of his impotence and his complete despoiling would be carried out in accordance with principles so true, so certain, so perfect, that there could never be a whisper raised - even in the lake of fire - against the fact or the method of the procedure."

 

(pgs 223 - 224)