Anonymous ID: facb85 July 24, 2019, 9 p.m. No.27710   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7715 >>8000 >>8178 >>8292 >>8373

>>27693

>>27677

I remember when Obama expanded the sharing capabilities right before he left office. It stunk to high heaven to me at the time because I was all over the whole unmasking/Russiagate/spying scandal at the time.

Here are a few relevant articles.

 

https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/12/obama-expands-the-nsas-ability-to-share-data-with-other-agencie/

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/obama-expanding-nsa-powers/513041/

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/01/obama-expands-surveillance-powers-his-way-out

Anonymous ID: facb85 July 25, 2019, 1:20 a.m. No.27887   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7895 >>7897 >>7918

>>27850

I don't believe that was the purpose. First of all, the changes were 8 years in the making, so put that aside. The real question is after such a long wait, why was it one of the last things done before the Hussein administration was no longer in control of our government?

 

So, what exactly did change? Only the sharing capabilities. Prior to the amendment, the NSA would filter the data before fulfilling any requests from the other government agencies. That means they would search and evaluate the data, use minimization procedures to protect information of innocent American citizens, and pass along the only the portions of emails and phone calls they deemed relevant to the request. NSA was in complete control of the raw data. Who was in charge of the NSA at the time? Admiral Mike Rogers.

 

The amendment didn't change anything about the raw data collection, but it put in place procedures that would have NSA share raw unminimized sigint with the other Intelligence Community agencies. Unminimized, meaning that all 16 IC agencies would have innocent citizens' personal data at their fingertips. Now, that is limited to only certain raw data, specifically for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence.

 

What investigations do we know of that were ongoing during this time period? Crossfire Hurricane? Hmmm. Carter Page -a foreign agent according to the FISA? Counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, then administration?

 

My opinion, the amendment was rushed through before Hussein left office so that the Deep State actors entrenched in our government could continue their spying efforts (and bypass Adm. Rogers at NSA) and enable their coup of our duly elected President.

 

Could this possibly be their insurance policy?

Anonymous ID: facb85 July 25, 2019, 2:49 a.m. No.27905   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7911

>>27897

>Does this relate to Barr talking about encryption?

No, I don't think it relates.

 

Interesting article, though, I hadn't seen that. It's a tough issue to tackle, and I can see the pros and cons. Obviously, law enforcement should be able to investigate crimes, including being able to access encrypted data/devices. On the other hand, I'm not sure there is any way backdoors could be added for law enforcement ONLY, and be kept secure from hackers. Seems like when it comes to technology the criminals are always a step ahead of the cops and the Feds.

Anonymous ID: facb85 July 25, 2019, 4:09 a.m. No.27920   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>27918

Yes, I remember that testimony. He was speaking to the procedures, but who's to say everyone in all agencies followed the procedures? It will be interesting if we ever find out the results of all the leak investigations. Remember Sessions saying they had...what was it, about 27 leak investigations going on?

Anonymous ID: facb85 July 25, 2019, 9:36 a.m. No.28105   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8149

>>28093

I don’t think the senile, doddering old fool description is accurate. What would one’s behavior look like if they were under duress because their - or a family member’s - life was at stake if they failed at their mission?

Remember McMaster’s father?