Their non answer is an answer. stay on Qresearch.
>Shut. Up.
Are you two? Are you incapable of constructing a well reasoned argument, so you must resort to the pettiness?
>You sir are a shill without logical thinking.
how is it illogical to say that by not answering your question Q is telling you stay?
>I am patient enough to wait days if not weeks for an answer. You thereby may be the problem we're having.
Sometimes you can't fix stupid...
>Q didnt say anyyhing
Exactly. Which means for the time being, he is staying on Qresearch.
>As for general opinion on the BO fuckery, he reposted an anon calling it out, thus supporting the previous board format.
Meaning if Q wanted to move They would let us know, because we can infer from Q posting about the BO fuckery, he is watching.
>Q said once that werever anons will go, q will follow.
Context matters, and I believe that was in response to needing to move off that current board.
>You donโt belong here. We have not had any attacks among anons until you showed up.
I am not attacking, I am telling the annon that the implied answer is that Q is not moving boards.
>Are you scared that Q will see all the Anons leaving qresearch & he might decide to kill jacks board?
Nah, I couldn't care less about where Q posts. If Q wants to move, so be it; But the point is, anons know Q monitors the boards and will tell us when it is time to move.
>All your lovely thesis is based on absolutely nothing, given that q clearly said before "where anon choose to go we will follow".
context matters, and that context was Q wanting to move from the (at the time) current board. When it is time to move again, Q will inform.
So your rebuttal to my "thesis" is baseless.
I was answering the question of "this board or that board" for Q. I never said leave here, I never said don't come here. I never said this board is bad mmmkay.
What's the problem?
>1. It was a statement that shows the thought behind the move
Which statement?
.2. Logical thinking dictates that if q says nothing about the current 2 board, than he hasnt given any opinion regarding it whatsoever. Anything other than thelat is your speculations and nothing more
Lets start at the beginning here:
>Q- Your input seems to be needed: https://8ch.net/qrb/res or https://8ch.net/qresearch/res
By not providing input (or an answer) his answer is to stay. which has been my point the whole time.
>3. By reposting that anons post, q clearly supported the previous version of qr.
I agree, again the original question was "to move or not to move" and my point the whole time, has been by not answering, Q's answer is to not move (where Q posts).
Are you incapable of following logic?
Not circular, you're just not seeing how remaining silent on the question means to stay.
>1. The statement "where anon decide to go we will follow".
That statement was when Q had already decided to move boards, was it not?
>2. Again, by not saying anything about the move, q simply didnt express any opinion regarding that, Not for nor against. These are facts.
Actually, that is incorrect. We know that Q monitors the board, we know that Q will provide input. So by not providing a positive response to the question, it is a reasonable assumption that Q's opinion is Q is staying on Qres.
>Suggesting that his silence means that we should stay on qr is your assumption, based on absolutely nothing.
Did I say to stay on Qres; or did I say Q is staying on Qres?
>The facts are that q didnt express any opinion on whether we should move or not.
Q aint yer daddy, you can go where ever you want. unless you don't have your papers, than you can't use the airports, and if you drive without your papers and get pulled over, you risk a jack booted thug stomping your face in.