Anonymous ID: 8cbb20 July 13, 2019, 1:53 p.m. No.3064   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3102 >>3165 >>3205 >>3206 >>3212 >>3220 >>3331 >>3384

Trying for a rational perspective in this BO shitstorm

 

Here it is again, another big attack on the board. Last time I remember anything close to this much disruption was when Q went AWOL for 3 or 4 weeks last summer and shills were posting that picture of POTUS that looked like the picture Q used as a "Proof" in the reflection photo along with the Air Force 1 reflection photo appearing to be from a news article. That either seemed to rustle a lot of anons' jimmies, or there were just tons of shills. Realistically, some people were most certainly doubting, the attack was fairly compelling and it didn't help that Q wasn't around. Now the same thing is happening again with respect to division among anons.

 

Whether you think BO is a shill or a saint, anons can all agree on one thing: THIS IS HURTING THE MOVEMENT. Over half of the boards are now just shit slinging over what is really a very trivial issue. That's not to say what BO did was a trivial issue, but that it can be easily corrected by what is happening now, an anon posting the notable section after the bake. There is absolutely no reason to migrate to a different board if the breads are still being made and anons can post their own notable buns in the threads. This is what (((they))) want. Division.

 

Lets consider the facts. BO said he wanted to consolidate all notables as an improvement for anons and remove the war room post. I'm sure we've all seen anon's response that Q agreed with. BO decides to leave the war room and move forward with the notable change given that anon's post was primarily about the importance of the war room. I understand and appreciate innovation. In order to improve, you are going to have to have change. I personally don't like the new notable system and I think it will be much more difficult for casual/new users to efficiently obtain information. But, maybe it's factually more streamlined.

 

However, the effectiveness of the new notable system is entirely irrelevant.

 

The fact is that this change, along with the apparently syndicated baker system, IS HURTING THE MOVEMENT. This should be blatantly obvious for everyone. Here's the issue:

 

If the strength of the movement was BO's number one priority, he would have reverted the changes by now

 

While innovation is necessary for growth, the previous system worked fine. When a software developer pushes a new patch that breaks the system, THEY IMMEDIATELY REVERT TO THE PREVIOUS WORKING PATCH. (Not to mention the interesting timing given the Epstein and R Kelly arrests.)

 

It's obvious that BO does not have the movement at the top of his priority list. But it honestly doesn't matter. As I stated above, it is an easy fix. Anons need to stop wasting their time talking about this issue and just conduct business as usual with an anon baker posting the standard notable section after the bake. At this point anyone participating in the shit slinging (on either side) is only damaging the movement and distracting from digging. Qresearch is the board that Q posts on, it's where we should stay. It's ours. It isn't "Comped" because the notables were moved and aren't included in the standard bake. Just post them after the bake, store offline, and literally nothing is different.

Anonymous ID: 8cbb20 July 13, 2019, 2:36 p.m. No.3249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3266 >>3277 >>3291 >>3312

>>3220

You aren't considering the effect that disruption has on digging and effective distribution of information with regards to the current split board situation. The hivemind is fractured. The movement's heartbeat is information

Anonymous ID: 8cbb20 July 13, 2019, 2:50 p.m. No.3300   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3321 >>3324

>>3212

>Further more, there should be several boards with q research. Easier and less stressful for the diggers.

 

So you think that 5 splinters operating at ~20% is better than 1 hivemind operating at 100% where everyone has instant access to all information from relevant digs? That's retarded anon

Anonymous ID: 8cbb20 July 13, 2019, 3 p.m. No.3358   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3379 >>3381 >>3385 >>3402 >>3453

>>3266

You are supporting an unsanctioned split in the boards when anons are posting the notables section after the bake, effectively resolving the operational issue. That's overreacting. I don't think that splitting the boards was necessary. Q is going to address this at some point, just wait for him to make the decision like he did for the move to 8chan. Most may be at both boards but any kind of split is going to hurt the hivemind. You aren't considering that anons' discussions are important to deciphering information as well. How many explanations of Q posts build off of a previous post? Tons. You aren't seriously making an argument that it's better to have two separate boards than one united one are you?

Anonymous ID: 8cbb20 July 13, 2019, 3:13 p.m. No.3417   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3433

>>3402

>I think for myself. Something you should've learned to do by now. Whole purpose of these boards.

I find this really interesting considering you don't understand the importance of a hivemind. Often times the discussion of "notable" posts is more notable than the OP itself.

 

>That place has become beyond a shitshow

It's been one day you weak little faggot.

 

>You're single minded

Again, interesting considering you don't seem to know what a hivemind is or what its purpose is.