>>30947

>>31171

When crime doesn't pay, your concept is invalidated.

Think about it

>>31185

People are more capable of gaindul employment than you credit them. They only need incentive to work, regardless of race.

>Remove the incentive of incarceration and a life of crime, watch the numbers shrivel.

>>31192

I can think of a shitload of 50-something guys (including me) who could tear business wide open if only the hiring idiots had the sense to make use of guys with a lifetime's worth of ethical and correct decisions.

>We could train a shole new level of 5th columnists

>>31200

Scotch-induced mis-spelling

>>31205

Some retail is honest.

They don't call it saving, they call it "spending less".

>>31199

Dub dubs are confirmation. Tks 4 da support, Bro. U spot on.

>>31215

You talkin to a LE anon who lost a $120k/yr job because I poked my nose where it didn't belong, then lost my livelihood when i couldn't afford re-cert or to defend my license over BS "you shoulda done this" regulatory crap totally divorced from reality.

I'm speaking the truth, you're the one playing race games.

I have nothing to gain by being honest. What's your excuse?

>>31247

Not accurate. It is a definite censorship tool.

Prior to COPA, copyrighted works were subject to use if there was no reproduction of the originsl work and no rogit by the one doing the reproduction (a meme recreates the original work with added language, typically).

So, no profit = no violation.

NOW, however, the new copyright law proposes NO USE regardless of profit. Do you see the dichotomy?

>>31256

rogit = profit.

Scotch. It's a bitch.