Here is another Eustace Mullins book "The Curse of Canaan"
https://ia802703.us.archive.org/31/items/pdfy-hH7b-2yjyACdh8nO/The%20Curse%20Of%20Canaan%20%5BA%20Demonology%20Of%20History%5D.pdf
Here is another Eustace Mullins book "The Curse of Canaan"
https://ia802703.us.archive.org/31/items/pdfy-hH7b-2yjyACdh8nO/The%20Curse%20Of%20Canaan%20%5BA%20Demonology%20Of%20History%5D.pdf
Not intended to be a slide. Just a quick observation, For what it's worth...
Just watched Tarrentino's new movie "Once Apon A Time in Hollywood". Never been a fan of him or his previous movies, but thought I would give this a chance. It's an intersting story, though there were moments in the first half that seemed to drag on it picked up pace as it got closer to the end. There wasn't any overt political statements being made. There is a Roman Polanski character but other than a couple of drive by shots, he is not part of the story.
There were some awesome monologues, and the ending was quite a surprise. All in all, for what it's worth, I give this one a thumbs up. Still not a Tarrentino fan but IMO this is his best movie.
I understand what you doing, this is your tactic, playing the holier than thou character. Talk about programming, your programmed response to attack is typical and was expected.
Sometimes it's important to separate the message from the messenger.
The pedo stuff is unacceptable.
As far as the movie, maybe there is some important piece of the puzzle to be gained by hearing the message.
No need to be so judgemental, that's God's job.
While I know the necessity of calling out the bad when we see it, I also believe that in order to stay balanced human beings, we need to recognize the good when we see that too.
If we wear the armor of God, it will protect us as we walk through the valley of darkness.
>If expected, why respond?
I wasn't going to respond but felt I need to because I thought it rather unfair of you to suggest that I am supporting pedophilia because of watching the movie. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I simply wanted to put that on the record.
I'm not here to be divisive. I've been here in the bunker since the beginning.
No need to respond as you said you won't.
Just adding this to the record kek!
Rep. John Ratcliffeโs full questioning of Robert Mueller | Mueller testimony
Rep. Matt Gaetzโs full questioning of Robert Mueller | Mueller testimony
Rep. Ratcliffe zeros in on exoneration line of questioning for Mueller
Old Article
Senate Committee Approves Intelligence Nominee Coats
March 9, 2017 06:35 PM
https://www.voanews.com/usa/us-politics/senate-committee-approves-intelligence-nominee-coats
Ratcliffe Grills AG Loretta Lynch on Clinton Email Investigation Decision