Good morning anons.

This just in.

FLOTUS, volume 11.

August issue.

>>30888

Trips confirm innocent poem.

>>30906

Nice.

>>31021

If laws like this go into effect, would it effect images created before?

>>31036

Truly a Temple of Doom.

>>31037

We're in this together Britanons and EUbros.

And everywhere else.

WWG1WGA WW

>>31042

I would think content owners would need to be careful as well.

This could have a chilling effect on people wanting to engage with their content.

>>31050

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/tarantino-billboards-hijacked-la-slam-epstein-polanski-pedowood-1227227

>>31235

Re: SES...

What exactly has the Government Accountability Office (GAO) been up to all these years?

>>31238

I was actually referring to the professional content creators holding the copyrights. Aggregating an audience in an increasingly fragmented world is hard as it is. If you start threatening to sue people for being into your material, people will just walk away further. Content creators want buzz/viral marketing.

While there are cases they would be justified in addressing infringement, shutting down harmless/playful actions will just hurt their viewership/readership. IMO.

>>31308

>>31379

Shrage. Interdashting.

>>30911

Here you go.

>>30914

It was harder. More serious pics and subjects.

>>31413

Great job Baker!!