Hello Joshua. Sorry I haven't been around. I've been out getting some sunshine. Mold grows in the shadows, ya know?
I really haven't noticed them. Couple of deeply misguided folks. But weren't we all for a long time?
Strange things. That's odd.
The replacement data doesn't make sense. You'd have to shoot the photo twice, to get the pixels to replace her head, from what's blocked by her head.
Bread seems a bit slow, anyone else enjoying a beverage and tunes this evening? Is there an analogue for you, <^>?
I don't have the details handy, but Malta was settled 6000 BC. It has been in the hands of the Knight's Hospitaller (Mirror of Templars - Serve the Vatican - Killed the Templars and took their stuff)
They have had it since 1088, I think. The Country of Malta entered the EU, but the Knights maintained a few Sovereign Properties, IIRC. It's a front, obviously, for (((them))).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
New interesting connection for me. They colonized [The Carribean]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitaller_colonization_of_the_Americas
The Hospitaller colonization of the Americas occurred during a 14-year period in which the Knights Hospitaller of Malta (at the time a vassal state of the Kingdom of Sicily)[1], led by Italian Grand Master Giovanni Paolo Lascaris, possessed four Caribbean islands: Saint Christopher, Saint Martin, Saint Barthélemy, and Saint Croix.
The Knights' presence in the Caribbean grew out of their order's close relationship with the French nobility and the presence of many members in the Americas as French administrators. The key figure in their brief foray into colonization was Phillippe de Longvilliers de Poincy, who was both a Knight of Malta and governor of the French colonies in the Caribbean. Poincy convinced the Knights to purchase the islands from the bankrupt Compagnie des Îles de l'Amérique in 1651 and stayed to govern them until his death in 1660. During this time, the Order acted as proprietor of the islands, while the King of France continued to hold nominal sovereignty; however, Poincy ruled largely independent of them both. In 1665, the Hospitallers sold their rights in the islands to the new French West India Company, bringing their colonial project to an end.
If you think about how the Protocols of Zion read, the Secret book of James reads a little differently.
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/jam2.html
The Gnostic Society Library
The Nag Hammadi Library
The Apocryphon of James
(The Secret Book of James)
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/jam2.html
In his introduction in The Complete Gospels, Donald Rappe notes the following on the unity of Secret James: "There are abrupt changes and inconsistencies between major sections of Secret James. Three theories, all of them plausible, have been advanced to explain this feature of the book. The first regards the letter (1:1-7) and the secret book as originally separate. The unity of the two sections, therefore, would be the work of a redactor, who in the process of editing embellished the material by enhancing the position of James. Another considers the passages on martyrdom (4:1-5:6) and prophecy (6:1-4) as secondary additions; their omission leaves a conceivably earlier document consisting of shorter sayings. A third theory views the document as the work of one author, for both the letter segment and the secret book use a rare grammatical feature, the beatitude with the verb in the future tense (1:4; 7:3; 8:3, 9). However, this could also be the work of a redactor attempting to harmonize the two sections."
Laughter is indeed the best medicine. Why do you think (((they))) co-opted the comedians and turned them into vipers?
Indeed, and thank you. Archive offline has never been more clear to my eyes. A place for everything and everything in its place.
Not a rabbi, just a humble anon. I took your advice anyway and appreciated the rest.