One moar time in Da New Bread.
TY to ALL BAKERS AND EBAKE ANONS.
May it always be hot and steamy, with a nice crust and a chewy center.
<Luv ya toast da most
One moar time in Da New Bread.
TY to ALL BAKERS AND EBAKE ANONS.
May it always be hot and steamy, with a nice crust and a chewy center.
<Luv ya toast da most
Just one moar proof that the First Bunch of Idiots (FBI) needs to be disbanded and subjected to severe corporal punishment.
They already know our identities. That's why I don't really worry about scrubbing shit.
Likewise, I don't care if the bad guys know, either. Hammered off my ass I'll still drive nails. And God forbid you succeed, there's only a long line of people who will make sure it wasn't for nothing.
Pic related.
And guess what, anon? Fam and frens all get similar protection. The eyes are everywhere, the ears hear everything. And somehow, almost by magic (it ain't), they are there.
If you think hard enough, I bet you've felt the warm fuzzy.
God's truly looking out for his own. Go sit in a metal chair in a thunderstorm while drinking beer from a can and scrolling on your phone. If it's your time, then nothing you (or I, or anyone else) can do about it.
It ain't our choice when we go.
That choice belongs solely to God
Thanks.
Kek to you! In my case, still waiting on the house (that disappeared 2010, thanks to Obuttfuck)...
I own my 23 year old shitty car and 18 year old less shitty truck outright, thanks to some compromises and temp help from folks that I paid back...
My very good gov't job was lost due to me getting too close to exposing a route of Cabal human trafficking, so now I work at a $12 hour job; and while I wish I was earning moar, I'm grateful to God that I have that - although I'd really like to be the high wage earner in my household again...
and my Country is still up for grabs, if we screw this up. NOT ON MY WATCH.
Life's good. Where's muh lawn chair and beer can, I see a thunderstorm on the horizon.
God bless ya, fren.
I'm too old to be an astronaut, MLB slugger or a dolphin trainer, so the boyhood goals are a thong of the past.
Although I suppose I might still be able to become a train engineer. Kek!
Glad you've been blessed by God, fren. Mau they aleays increase!
Pretty sure the Fibbies just declared us Pubic Enemy #1....
<because we've kicked them in the balls.
Fine by me. We're still gonna win.
Hey Bakes
How 'bout adding this >>34838 to the thread on QAnon being included in the FBI conspiracy list? Looks relevant.
Anon included sauce >https://mobile.twitter.com/chiefpolice2/status/1157161384443908096
I checked it out, it's a real twat. Hate to go with feelz but it gives me legit tingles. Dis @chiefpolice2 guy knows something. He's retired LEO and claims sources that would be inside (my guess is a bud in one of the FusionCenters). He cannot reveal due to source's loss of job if it happens.
Unbelievably Notable Here
Just went back a few breads in QR to >>>qresearch/res/7305850 to read this:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/274484/new-evidence-unveils-disturbing-facts-about-deborah-weiss
May already be a notable, but Imma drop this bomb here:
<DOJ granted Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson IMMUNITY for potential violations of the ESPIONAGE ACT.
SMH
Providing the cap from the article here. Read the last paragraph.
I checked earlier and 62 through 437 were there.
Question is, why was everything after 437 wiped out?
The way I read this, the "immunity" was not necessarily granted in exchange for full testimony or cooperation, so right off the bat that calls the validity of this immunity deal into question.
There are 3 possible ways this immunity grant is bypassed. Here they are:
The easiest way is for the person granted immunity to violate the terms of the agreement, for example to lie after promising to tell the truth in exchange for the immunity. If proven, the violation of the immunity deal functions as the person's revocation of the agreement and
poof
no more immunity.
The government later decides to prosecute for the same crime based ENTIRELY on evidence obtained independently of the immunity grant. This one's dicier.
The immunity agreement (or Non Prosecution Agreement as the Feds like to call it) is determined to be VOID as against public policy. Imho, that would apply to the Mills/Samuelson agreements - what government in their right minds grants immunity for TREASON?
>But that's just me.
Keep in mind that there is a 4th possible way that the immunized scumbag gets prosecuted...and that's for entirely new crimes that occur after the effective date of the immunity deal. No one can grant immunity to commit crimes in the future.
<Please keep in mind that this is a very rough and oversimplified summary, not because anons can't understand but because the subject is highly complex.
I'm sure I left something out somewhere, or shaved off an important point for sake of brevity. But that's the very rough outline.
Baker please add this to the
NOTABLE
about Patriots Fight getting cleared.
I'm the guy who posted >>34876 and >>34877 and now I'm glad I didn't vouch. See cap.
>This says it's a Libertarian discussion board.
Can't place the face in that photo, but the photo itself doesn't look like anything Q would post for a successor board.
Yeah, the whole immunity deal stinks for that reason alone. "We'll let you hold it, but you can't look at anything in it." HTF is that cooperation?
Also, it stinks that Mills/Samuelson became Hilldawg's personal attorneys. Betcha they hid all their sins under the "attorney work-product doctrine" among other bogus legal bases to withhold evidence of their own malfeasance.
>And they probably didn't even list their existence in privilege logs, either, as attorneys are required to do.
I'm not embellishing with guesses. I stated my opinion that, based on what I saw, the info he shared looks legitimate (meaning the FBI bulletin that Yahoo posted did NOT list QAnon as a domestic terror-conspiracy group, and that was added by Yahoo and/or HuffPo).
I'm prior LE myself, although I don't have access to that kind of sauce. So I can't vouch, but I can say that it has some of the hallmarks of being truthful info. Agree with you that he had to post a photo of him in his uni, non-LE are not allowed to impersonate (but, then again, there's all kinds of people who don't actually follow the law.)
I think we're saying the same thing, fren, but maybe you just read me wrong.
So, nu? Pretty sure I just said that people don't always follow the law, see >>34926
My expectations are 'bout the same as yours, it seems. A guy posts with a chief of police uni (note the eagle, that's frequently the insignia worn by municipal chiefs), that's something you don't generally perceive to be illegitimate on its face.
BTW, nice dig.
We gud, Brah!
And technically, I was a legal advisor, not an actual cop (although I played part-time aggressor for the SWAT boys).
But I did serve in the Nav. So, you're welcome.
And most important, thank YOU (and every other anon) for your service here, and for being the kind of folks that make our country worth serving!