If a bloody warning or distraction was called for, the following story might be why:

Celebrities, royals and politicians brace themselves as court orders release of explosive Jeffrey Epstein files

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/08/03/celebrities-royals-politicians-brace-court-orders-release-explosive/

If the Telegraph knows something we don't about the timing of the Epstein document release, well, they didn't share it in the article. But it is about that time, according to original estimates of the review and redaction period.

Just sayin.

>>35986

You took some QR dufus' word for it instead of looking at the data.

First of all, the shooting began at around 10AM ET. Look at the timestamp on your 4chan thread OP. HOURS AFTER THE SHOOTING.

Also, look at the archive.is post. It STILL links to the original pdf document, not screenshot images of each page. The 8ch /pol/ post has the shooter's comments about what he's going to do.

The 4chan THREAD OP that you linked to just has screenshotted images of the shooter's original pdf document.

8ch /pol/ was original source of manifesto.

Which we STILL can't verify is from this shooter yet.

>>36075

The 4-chan RE-post thread is still online, so you can go there with the following link, and see the timestamp for your time zone.

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/221633324/el-paso-tarrant-manifesto

Original manifesto post, tho, is gone / 404 now.

https://8ch.net/pol/res/13561044.html

Could maybe test what time zone archive.is accesses from and calculate time of original post using that info. I think I will try that. They might have multiple servers in different time zones, tho, so don't know that the info would be definitive.