Anonymous ID: 600ce0 Aug. 3, 2019, 7:19 p.m. No.36253   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6262 >>6269 >>6588 >>6590

>>36243

I am a photographer of sorts. Many things come into play. For example:

What cell phone was used?

Were the pics taken with the same cell?

What were the lighting conditions at each shot?

Until those questions are answered, you cannot say the set up is fake.

It's logical reasoning, anon.

Anonymous ID: 600ce0 Aug. 3, 2019, 7:29 p.m. No.36270   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>36262

I tire of those who have no understanding of the basic technicalities of such things automatically assuming that what they are seeing is a true representation.

Thanks for getting it.

Anonymous ID: 600ce0 Aug. 3, 2019, 7:39 p.m. No.36278   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6289

>>36269

A flip phone takes better pictures? When I think of flip phones, I think of early 2000s phones.

Secondly, I wouod agree it's possible that the pics could be manipulated, but you still have to answer the same questions I noted above.

Let's assume they have been manipulated. The question then becomes by whom? Some will automatically say by (((them))). But, it could also be true that it was simply shills or trolls who like to fuck with anons.

Lots of questions to be answered.

Anonymous ID: 600ce0 Aug. 3, 2019, 8:26 p.m. No.36325   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6332

Maybe.....but some of those assholes feel justified to the point that they woukd learn. Besides, how good do you have to be to shoot fish in a barrel?

>>36321

Anonymous ID: 600ce0 Aug. 3, 2019, 8:39 p.m. No.36348   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>36342

To me there is no doubt there were 2 shooters in Vegas. Whole lotta info being held on that one.

Boston, I do not believe, was a ff.