>Wait until Quidance is given, we will know via Q
the ultimate arbiter of which board is official is of course Q
btw. 8bit... maybe this time around you'll allow some workable type of baker ID so the anons can positively tell one baker from another.
>use ID only when baking
use ID only when baking
that was the plan, whitelisted trips for bakers
new bakers can be added to whitelist
bad bakers can be removed from whitelist
>it's called tripcodes here
>I wanted positive ID for bakers here so all could be sure who they were talking to
>must have ID to chastise errant baker
>must have ID to help sincere baker student
>must have ID to trade style hints & baking tips
>>>/comms/1437
the curse of the 'baker's union' tainted the whole debate.
in the long run it's up to the BO & staff to police the baking in one way or another.
FastJack has set himself up to proctor the noteables thread and is in for a headache he won't forget.
I baked in the early (pre #1000) breads
I started /comms/ as a place to help train bakers
I no longer bake due to several factors the major one being equipment & internet connection speeds causing horrible lag to the point I cannot keep up when the posting exceeds 10 post/minute
it truly seems that the genesis of notables and the debates around the posting of them has been forgotten
>avatarfagging is no different from famefagging.
using the avatar so an anon can be ID'd for continuity's sake is far far different than famefagging for notoriety and profit
don't you like to know that the kitchen is in good hands? or at least hands that have a known rather than unknown bias?
>don't use artificial means to inflate their authority.
where does McThistle get this 'authority' ?
and how is it 'artificially inflated'?
isn't it respect for McThistle anons past posts that engender respect or disrespect / authority or ignominy
If all anons were capable of pure reasoning and critical thought authority figures wouldn't be necessary, but since there are a few newbies in the crowd...
from my observations McThistle is benign ~ helpful and thus your own opinion
>99% of the time thistle is no problem, pic or no pic.
I'll just take it that you are suspicious of all authority figures
for the record, so am I
>So, in my mind, other than bakers when someone posts an avatar they lose credibility.
always exceptions aren't there
>pic related
I'd give it a few days for the serious diggers to learn they can post here.
some of those anons do nothing but dig 'n post and pay little or no attention to the board or board politics
been tracking the fuckery since AFLB was relieved of it's BV duties for violating an 8ch rule when it wholesale banned entire IP ranges.
the subversive bakers and notable fuckery has increased in intensity and frequency pretty much steadily since
there were reasons I quit archiving notables at /comms/ a while back
8bit's departure was odd
FacistJack's reign was... well facist
the temp's been climbing for a year or more by my reckoning
8bit got the temp cooled off for periods of time, but the steady heat from shills & clowns seems to have won in the end
the story's not over yet
time will tell