Anonymous ID: 02b27f Nov. 23, 2019, 11:42 a.m. No.38124   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8127 >>8153 >>8228 >>8245

>>38121

Wonderful!

Several memes collected during the hiatus have been posted in >>>/qresearch/7077975

There is a new mega account and new folder for Nov 2019 here

Meme Ammo

November 2019

https://mega.nz/#F!JYpRmAID!x8SJn3I02qiHSsOhzSaAcQ

 

N.B. I am NOT memefarming. Kek. No commitment. Will stop the moment the wrist damage flares up again. So far so good. Somebody stop me!

Anonymous ID: 02b27f Nov. 23, 2019, 11:43 a.m. No.38125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8126 >>8128 >>8129

>>38123

Why don't anons just take Q's word for it, regulations Nat Sec prevent Q from using open source public key cryptography to validate identity. The reasoning behind those regulations is not something we need to delve into. If Q says he's not doing it that way, end of discussion, amirite fam?

Q KNOWS what Q is doing. Q has world class crypto expertise backing up his operation. Who are we to second guess that?

Anonymous ID: 02b27f Nov. 23, 2019, 12:16 p.m. No.38130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8133

>>38128

Sorry if you're relying on PGP for something. Know that there is no absolute privacy. EVERYthing is comped or can be. People who are relying on PGP need to understand that. It's an axiom of crypto that anything can be broken, given enough computer time. The point is that the more valuable a target, the more computer time will be devoted to break it. If all you're trying encrypt are comms to your mother about Thanksgiving dinner, no problem. Those with more sensitive topics might have a concern. A long time ago I came to realize that security is in layers ... who are you hoping to protect your comms from? Just people on your local area network? People who work at your ISP? Corporate spies? Nation-actor spies? Privacy of personal info to prevent identity theft?

Anything that can be broken will be, proportional to its importance to those attempting to break it. We basically stopped talking about certain things even inside our own home, even when walking out of doors.

Data is in cleartext when inside the memory of your computer/device. Hacks that access that hardware hypervisor inside the Intel CPU potentially have access to EVERYTHING. There are laser thingies that can point at the window from a mile away and read your lips or pick up vibrations of your speech or detect faint variations in the light of the LEDs on the back of your modem or ethernet cable. There are malware that get inside the firmware of your hard drive or networking adapter and cannot be removed or detected. There is a kind of malware that can jump across boundaries in memory or read adjacent bits they are not supposed to have access to. There's a kind of malware that uses vibrations of the moving parts of a spinning hard drive or CD-ROM drive to detect auditory info.

There. Is. No. Privacy. Whatsoever.

It's a fact I hate, but it is the truth.