Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 21, 2019, 9:03 a.m. No.38081   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>38072

Taking a flying leap into the darkness. Trying to post into QRB #49. Too many headers here to know if the thing is working or not. I see that a Baker has been here and left some current-dated bread structure, but no evidence anyone else has.

 

QR is cool (Hi Q!)... but it seemed like more and deeper digs were happening in QRB, so this where I want to be. Missing my professional pals -- architects, engineers, legal department and so on.

 

12:02 ET 11-21-2019

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 21, 2019, 9:19 a.m. No.38082   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>38071

>>38079

Final count I had before deplatforming was 7. That was probably only a partial count even then. I don't recall the specifics except for two public attempts during the campaign that the SS stopped after they were in motion (Trump onstage) and the woman (in Arkansas?) who had manipulated her way into an invitation to the back room area who was caught before she could launch her attack. Also, the attempted car ramming of "The Beast". Sorry, using a 70 year old brain and the names and dates are eluding me.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 22, 2019, 6:24 p.m. No.38100   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8101 >>8104

>>38098

Thinking the interface between Schitt and the witnesses might be a good place.

Then, too, there's the purchase of Little St. James by Sheik Rattelnrol. That hasn't been touched yet. We were doing some pretty good work about the island just prior to "the incident".

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 22, 2019, 6:32 p.m. No.38101   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>38100

Also the adulterous relationship between N. Pelosi and the unions in re the trade deal with Canada and Mexico. What is the objection the unions have to pulling American jobs back this side of the border? Why is Nancy sitting on the bill? Cui bono?

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 10:47 a.m. No.38119   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8122 >>8128 >>8228 >>8245

>>38116

http://www.stationgossip.com/2019/11/liberal-law-prof-tells-disappointed-cbs.html

Why would the hidden hands that guide CBS allow this to air?

 

>>38117

I understand it to mean that there are vulnerabilities not publicly known. For one thing, quantum computing is probably further along than the public is aware of, making brute force attacks simple and time efficient. MOST communications aren't worth the effort, but SOME are. I would imagine that the DOD comms are in that second group. Breaking Q comms would be the crowbar in the crack. The public side of Q is interesting, but hardly critical -- even the more cryptic comms probably have alternate paths to target. But if Q is who he says he is, being able to impersonate Q to others in DOD would be critical almost immediately. Their first response would identify them ... and from there it's "loose cannon on deck" time.

PGP used to be in the "never crack it in time" sort of code. Now, for those with sufficiently deep pockets, it's basically "in the clear" in realtime.

 

I suppose we could always go back to "One Time Pads".

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 12:08 p.m. No.38129   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>38125

I Do take Q's word for it, notwithstanding attempts to ponder the "why" behind it. Like you said, at the end of the day, Q has said what he is and is not willing to do.

My need for comm security is much lower than his. There is less chance that I will be targeted because the information I might have is of much lower quality.

I'm not worth targeting.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 12:21 p.m. No.38131   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8209

>>38128

Friend, if Google has what we think they have AND they aren't the only ones, we go underground. We go silent. And we fight. We join the Church of the Latter Day Luddites.

And we hope that our brothers elsewhere are able to fight, too, because that level of computational power signals the end of humans as humans if it falls into the wrong hands and if it is not destroyed "in the cradle", it WILL fall into "the wrong hands" ... in fact, those are the only hands that will ever touch it.

Our "noble experiment" will vanish in an invisible stream of 1s and 0s.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 12:32 p.m. No.38133   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8134 >>8135

>>38130

For a while, we could have overwhelmed the inquisitors with sheer volume. When decryption was computationally expensive, knowing which message to decrypt could be the hardest problem of all. But the uptake was never sufficient for that - there weren't enough encrypted messages to mask the important ones with a flood of yoga pants encryption fluff and now it's a solved problem when computational speeds allow you to simply decrypt EVERY message and then pass them off to other computers for content analysis which gets passed on down the chain until eventually resulting in an action order and a quiet pickup as you leave your house for work one morning.

Look at the advances in facial and voice recognition. Those take a ginormous amount if clock cycles ... and yet both China and the UK have the cameras on every corner in every larger city.

I see a very dystopian future ahead of us if we cannot ride the tiger that is technology. And, so far, we can't.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 12:39 p.m. No.38136   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>38132

Thanks for the updates. For a while they seemed to have been invaded by Antifa, who were acting as "agents provocateur" (sp?). Has that been dealt with?

It was good to see the movement spreading globally, like being a Qanon, but, as here, infiltration has been a problem.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 1:27 p.m. No.38150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>38147

3608

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No.7358338 ๐Ÿ“

Nov 20 2019 13:18:53 (EST)

All assets [F + D] being deployed.

[Some] who once supported POTUS [sleepers] have/will turn [puppets & puppet masters].

Control of narrative = control of public opinion

Control of public opinion = power

EVERYTHING IS AT STAKE.

OLD GUARD POWER STRUCTURE BEING DESTROYED.

WASHINGTON CIVIL WAR [CONTROL THE NARRATIVE].

PREV EXPOSURE OF TRUTH.

[SELF PRESERVATION]

FIGHTING FOR SURVIVAL.

INFORMATION WARFARE.

Q

 

It's sometimes hard to know who your friends are. There was a time when I would have simply tented my hands reflexively as I was thinking through something. He may be doing the same. Or, he may be signaling a loyalty.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 7:43 p.m. No.38167   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8170

My second wife had a non-descript, part terrier, part social climber, dog who famously liked to find dead fish when at the beach and to roll around in them. Apparently it was a way of remembering a day at the beach. She and her kids thought this was funny. As one of the mutts favorite humans, I did not but, wanting to remain on good terms with them (an ultimately futile endeavor), I refrained from comment even more than I refrained from contact.

 

I was thinking about the shills over on QR and wondering if they might be related to that dog somehow. Or, if not the dog, perhaps the 12 year old step daughter whose life's ambition was to be a table dancer. I understand that she graduated high school and immediately pursued her dream occupation. By that time I was years out of the picture and was not surprised to later learn that she was "in rehab".

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 8:23 p.m. No.38171   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8174

>>38170

I don't know "why shills". I think many of them are lightly paid information workers who simply do not comprehend the damage they are doing while others see it as some juvenile rite of passage. Passage to what? I really have no clue.

 

In the meantime, I thought the board might enjoy this:

https://twitter.com/goingpostalvids

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 23, 2019, 8:38 p.m. No.38172   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

3599

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No.7356265 ๐Ÿ“

Nov 16 2019 13:13:56 (EST)

The Harvest [crop] has been prepared and soon will be delivered to the public for consumption.

A Higher Loyalty [Y].

Hunters become the Hunted.

Treason.

Sedition.

How do you remove a liability?

Six o' clock can be dangerous.

Family proud?

Q

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 24, 2019, 8:37 a.m. No.38178   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8186

>>38174

>information workers

>Interesting term, never heard it before.

 

As used here, consider it derogatory -- analogous to "sex worker," but applied to those who deliberately spread false information for incremental (per post / per response) pay. It particularly applies to those who use comment boards such as this one for this purpose.

Anonymous ID: ef450d Nov. 24, 2019, 1:06 p.m. No.38184   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8198

>>38182

Happy Sunday to you, too! Nice to see Anons drifting back in. I wonder how many have found their way back so far ... do we HAVE a quorum? Do we need one? Is there a critical mass that results in significant ongoing digs?